On Sep 25, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
I want to be a bit careful here.For me, the wording on the service interface is more than a bit overstated, but as long as we treat it as interim, I'm fine with it. I suspect that one of the issues driving things is a differing view of the service being provided. But I need to have more discussions with various folks before I can defend that proposition.
My issue is not with the question of whether this is a service interface or not...
My issue is that it says that this encapsulation is "the service interface", as in the only service interface, between the mapping system and the xTRs. However, I think that this encapsulation only applies to the Map-Request. The Map-Register and Map-Reply don't use it. Right? There is other wording that also implies that the Map- Register and Map-Reply will be encapsulated, and I want to confirm that they won't.
Margaret
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.