> From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw at sandstorm.net>
> I think that this encapsulation only applies to the Map-Request. The
> Map-Register and Map-Reply don't use it. Right?
Well, I wouldn't call it 'encapsulation' - it's authentication field(s) added
to Map-Request packets, and yes, AFAIK, the Map-Register and Map-Reply don't
use it.
> There is other wording that also implies that the Map- Register and
> Map-Reply will be encapsulated, and I want to confirm that they won't.
They will be 'encapsulated' (as in, wrapped inside another IP/UDP/LISP
header), but they will not have these authentication fields (AFAIK). Was
that what you were asking?
Noel
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.