| Hi, The current description of issue #16 Map Versioning Discussion is a bit misleading. The current one is: draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-00 proposes introducing a map versioning field into LISP. Dino proposes to include text in lisp-04 that has been discussed with the authors of that draft. This issue tracks whether we have WG consensus to do that and if not may turn into an issue for the broder map versioning issues. After the discussion on the mailinglist (also concerning the R-bit) I think that a more exact description would be: New proposed one: draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-00 proposes introducing the optional possibility for LISP header to transport map version numbers. Luigi will provide a new version of the draft which will include both discussion from the mailinglist as well as the discussion with all LISP developers. This means that all the details of the map versioning support will be detailed in the versioning draft and not in the main LISP specs. After publication of the new map versioning draft, the WG will discuss its technical validity and how to proceed with the work. Would be possible to change the description on the issue tracker? Luigi |
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.