[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lisp] Who is affected by the RRG LISP conflict Friday morning

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
To: lisp at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:51:19 -0400

Scott Brim points out that the second session of LISP is scheduled
opposite the RRG Friday morning.  Who here will be negatively affected
by that conflict?

(In parallel, I'm looking at options for deconflicting, but one input
into that process is information about how bad the conflict is.)

Darrel and I will coordinate and get approval from Jari before making
any changes.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lisp] Who is affected by the RRG LISP conflict Friday morning
  - From: Templin, Fred L
- Re: [lisp] Who is affected by the RRG LISP conflict Friday morning
  - From: Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Who is affected by the RRG LISP conflict Friday morning
  - From: Eduardo Ascenço Reis
- Re: [lisp] Who is affected by the RRG LISP conflict Friday morning
  - From: Lixia Zhang

Prev by Date: Re: [lisp] Requesting time to discuss my proposed security model
Next by Date: Re: [lisp] Who is affected by the RRG LISP conflict Friday morning
Previous by thread: [lisp] Second call for Agenda items
Next by thread: Re: [lisp] Who is affected by the RRG LISP conflict Friday morning
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.