Re: [lisp] Update on moving LISP

["Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis at cisco.com>]

My initial thoughts are that we will need the extra time to get
everything we'd like to do done.  We'll publish a draft agenda this week
to give people some information on which to base their attendance
choices.

-Darrel 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lisp-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:lisp-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Margaret Wasserman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:38 AM
> To: Sam Hartman
> Cc: lisp at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [lisp] Update on moving LISP
> 
> 
> Do we actually need two sessions if one of them is going to conflict  
> with the RRG?  Or will we have enough people missing that it 
> would be  
> better to just have a single session?
> 
> Margaret
> 
> On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > So far the news is not encouraging for moving LISP away 
> from the RRG.
> >
> > Darrel and I are working on structuring the agenda to 
> minimize impact
> > if people need to skip the Friday session in order to 
> attend the RRG.
> > _______________________________________________
> > lisp mailing list
> > lisp at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>