Re: [lisp] Comments to LISP+ALT draft

[Vince Fuller <vaf at cisco.com>]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:34:53PM +0200, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> Hello 
> 
> After reading the LISP+ALT (draft-ietf-lisp-alt-01) I have following
> comments, suggestions and questions. 
> 
> General comment:
> 
> LISP+ALT draft lacks consistency with draft-ietf-lisp-ms-04, instead the
> term "configuration" is used quite broadly covering the area of the
> mentioned draft and leaving too much for a reader to fill in the caps.
> See below what I mean:

Hello Hannu-

Thanks for the comments. The LISP+ALT spec authors are reviewing them and
considering how best to incorporate your suggestions.

I am a little hesitant to simply make all of the changes that you have
offered because the LISP+ALT spec pre-dates LISP-MS and is still intended
to be independent of it. I do agree that this historical fact has created
some inconsistencies between the two documents but need to consider how to
modify the wording in LISP+ALT to clarify things without at the same time
sacrificing its independence from LISP-MS.

	--Vince
	(for the LISP+ALT authors)