ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Feb 15 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Comorian and other issues, John Cowan
• Feb 15 2007
• [Ltru] Comorian and other issues, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Ietf-languages Digest, Vol 50, Issue 15, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Ietf-languages Digest, Vol 50, Issue 15, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Ietf-languages Digest, Vol 50, Issue 15, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, John Cowan
• [Ltru] RE: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Tag MIB) toProposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
• [Ltru] Re: "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] RE: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Tag MIB) to Proposed Standard, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 14 2007
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, David Starner
• Re: [Ltru] Re: "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress), Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress), Marion Gunn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, David Starner
• Re: [Ltru] "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress), Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Mark Davis
• Feb 13 2007
• [Ltru] RE: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Don Osborn
• [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguages, countries & orthographies, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Progress, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: Progress, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Progress, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Progress, Martin Duerst
• Feb 12 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Progress, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Progress, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Progress, Doug Ewell
• Feb 11 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Progress, Frank Ellermann
• Feb 10 2007
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Ta g MIB) to Proposed Standard, McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] Re: Progress, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Tag MIB) to Proposed Standard, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Tag MIB) to Proposed Standard, Doug Ewell
• Feb 09 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Progress, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Progress, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Progress, Peter Constable
• Feb 08 2007
• [Ltru] Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Tag MIB) to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Re: [Ltru] Progress, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Progress, Doug Ewell
• Feb 03 2007
• [Ltru] Status of RFC 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Jan 31 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Mark Davis
• Jan 30 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] New edition of ISO 3166-1, Martin Duerst
• Jan 29 2007
• [Ltru] Re: New edition of ISO 3166-1, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] New edition of ISO 3166-1, Doug Ewell
• Jan 26 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: HOWTO register a subtag, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: HOWTO register a subtag, Frank Ellermann
• Jan 25 2007
• [Ltru] Re: HOWTO register a subtag, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Google and marking the languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Jan 24 2007
• [Ltru] Re: HOWTO register a subtag, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Google and marking the languages, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Google and marking the languages, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Google and marking the languages, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RE: HOWTO register a subtag (Was: rejecting proposals based on syntax, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Google and marking the languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] HOWTO register a subtag (Was: rejecting proposals based on syntax, John Cowan
• [Ltru] HOWTO register a subtag (Was: rejecting proposals based on syntax, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Jan 23 2007
• RE: [Ltru] N'Ko again, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: ASCII escapes for Unicode characters, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again, Martin Duerst
• Jan 21 2007
• Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again, Doug Ewell
• Jan 21 2007
• [Ltru] Re: N'Ko again, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] N'Ko again, Don Osborn
• [Ltru] N'Ko again, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [EAI] ASCII escapes for Unicode characters, Frank Ellermann
• Jan 19 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Question about 639-3 value "Castillian", Doug Ewell
• Jan 18 2007
• RE: [Ltru] Question about 639-3 value "Castillian", ISO639-3
• Jan 16 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Question about 639-3 value "Castillian", ISO639-3
• Jan 16 2007
• RE: [Ltru] Question about 639-3 value "Castillian", Chris Cox
• RE: [Ltru] Question about 639-3 value "Castillian", Karen_Broome
• RE: [Ltru] Question about 639-3 value "Castillian", Chris Cox
• [Ltru] Question about 639-3 value "Castillian", Karen_Broome
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Doug Ewell
• Jan 14 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01, Doug Ewell
• Jan 13 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, Frank Ellermann
• Jan 12 2007
• Re: [Ltru] 639 coding wrt historic varieties (was RE: Request forvariant subtag, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] 639 coding wrt historic varieties (was RE: Request forvariant subtag, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 639 coding wrt historic varieties (was RE: Request forvariant subtag, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Re: Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Last few questions for draft-4645bis-01, Doug Ewell
• Jan 11 2007
• Re: [Ltru] 639 coding wrt historic varieties (was RE: Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c Resubmitted!), David Starner
• Re: [Ltru] 639 coding wrt historic varieties (was RE: Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c Resubmitted!), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] 639 coding wrt historic varieties (was RE: Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c Resubmitted!), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Status of ISO 639-3?, Peter Constable
• Jan 09 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Karen_Broome
• Jan 08 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Status of ISO 639-3?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Status of ISO 639-3?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Status of ISO 639-3?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Frank Ellermann
• VS: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Erkki I. Kolehmainen
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Doug Ewell
• Jan 07 2007
• [Ltru] Status of ISO 639-6?, Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Jan 06 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Simplified ABNF (was: two identical singleton extension tags issue), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Jan 05 2007
• RE: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Martin Duerst
• Jan 03 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Definition of "grandfathered" considered lame, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Definition of "grandfathered" considered lame, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Definition of "grandfathered" considered lame, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Jan 03 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Definition of "grandfathered" considered lame, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Definition of "grandfathered" considered lame, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Definition of "grandfathered" considered lame, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Unresolved issues for draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Security and nationality, Addison Phillips
• Jan 02 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] Security and nationality, Nicolas Krebs
• Jan 01 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Addison Phillips
• Dec 28 2006
• [Ltru] Re: Security and nationality, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Obsolete text about extlangs (Was: submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-02, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Security and nationality, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Security and nationality, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Security and nationality, Jukka K. Korpela
• [Ltru] Obsolete text about extlangs (Was: submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-02, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Security and nationality, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Dec 26 2006
• [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Martin Duerst
• Dec 25 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c Resubmitted!, Martin Duerst
• Dec 21 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Framing the Alpha-3 turf, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Dec 20 2006
• [Ltru] Re: Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c Resubmitted!, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] Maybe off-topic: Retiring country code top-level domains, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Stability considerations (was: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Maybe off-topic: Retiring country code top-level domains, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Doug Ewell
• Dec 19 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] Fw: 68th IETF Registration, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c Resubmitted!, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] submitted draft-02, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-02, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Addison Phillips
• Dec 18 2006
• [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Forward-Compatibility Issue, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Forward-Compatibility Issue, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Forward-Compatibility Issue, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Forward-Compatibility Issue, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Marion Gunn
• RE: [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Proposal to clarify administration of RFC 4646, Martin Duerst
• Dec 17 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposal to clarify administration of RFC 4646, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Proposal to clarify administration of RFC 4646, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, John Cowan
• Dec 16 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Errata in RFC 4646 and 4646bis, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Errata in RFC 4646 and 4646bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Errata in RFC 4646 and 4646bis, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: two identical singleton extension tags issue, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Errata in RFC 4646 and 4646bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Survey on inverted vs. uninverted names, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Errata in RFC 4646 and 4646bis, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Errata in RFC 4646 and 4646bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, John Cowan
• Dec 15 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Doug Ewell
• Dec 14 2006
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: draft-02 available online.., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] draft-02 available online.., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Dubious fr-Latn-CA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Description field ordering, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Description field ordering, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Dubious fr-Latn-CA (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] two identical singleton extension tags issue, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Well-formed vs. regular (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, John Cowan
• Dec 13 2006
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Case-insensitive rules (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Addison Phillips
• Dec 12 2006
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] More about Description fields, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] More about Description fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Peter Constable
• Dec 11 2006
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• Re: RE: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, chris.cox
• RE: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, John Cowan
• Dec 10 2006
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Re: fon* variants, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: fon* variants, John Cowan
• Dec 09 2006
• [Ltru] Re: fon* variants, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: fon* variants, Mark Davis
• Dec 08 2006
• Re: [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] To invert or not to invert?, Doug Ewell
• Dec 07 2006
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: Uralic Phonetic Alphabet, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: Uralic Phonetic Alphabet, Martin Hosken
• RE: [Ltru] Proposal for a LTRU Web page, McDonald, Ira
• Dec 06 2006
• Re: [Ltru] submission: draft-ietf-ltru-rfc4646bis, version 01, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] submission: draft-ietf-ltru-rfc4646bis, version 01, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Alemanic & Swiss German, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Martin Duerst
• Dec 05 2006
• [Ltru] CS comes back to hanut ISO 3166/MA again, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Alemanic & Swiss German, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Alemanic & Swiss German, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Alemanic & Swiss German, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Fw: Alemanic & Swiss German, Karen_Broome
• Dec 04 2006
• [Ltru] Proposal for a LTRU Web page, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, John Cowan
• RE: (iso639.2322) RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Christian Galinski
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Gerard Meijssen
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Alemanic & Swiss German, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Alemanic & Swiss German, Doug Ewell
• Dec 03 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Brian E Carpenter
• Dec 02 2006
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Alemanic & Swiss German, chris.cox
• [Ltru] Re: Alemanic & Swiss German, Doug Ewell
• Dec 01 2006
• [Ltru] a little consideration..., Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Swiss German (was ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Mark Davis
• Nov 30 2006
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Swiss German (was ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised), Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Swiss German (was ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised), Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Alemanic & Swiss German, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] RE: Swiss German (was ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised), Martin Duerst
• Nov 29 2006
• Re: [Ltru] RE: Swiss German (was ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised), John Cowan
• [Ltru] RE: Swiss German (was ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Swiss German (was ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Tag wisely (was: Phonetic orthographies), Martin Duerst
• Nov 28 2006
• [Ltru] Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: Uralic Phonetic Alphabet, Marion Gunn
• Nov 27 2006
• [Ltru] Tag wisely (was: Phonetic orthographies), Frank Ellermann
• Nov 23 2006
• [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] RE: Phonetic orthographies, Kenneth Whistler
• Nov 22 2006
• [Ltru] RE: Phonetic orthographies, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] RE: Phonetic orthographies, Kenneth Whistler
• IPA AGAIN was RE: [Ltru] Google and marking the languages, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, David Starner
• [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Kenneth Whistler
• RE: [Ltru] Google and marking the languages, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac]... [was: IPA...], Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 11179 conformance and a new draft, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Google and marking the languages, Dave Pawson
• RE: [Ltru] Google and marking the languages, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Google and marking the languages, Jukka K. Korpela
• [Ltru] Google and marking the languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 11179 conformance and a new draft, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Kenneth Whistler
• Nov 21 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 11179 Summary was RE: ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 11179 conformance and a new draft, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 11179 conformance and a new draft, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, John Cowan
• [Ltru] ISO 11179 conformance [was: something else], Misha Wolf
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 11179 Summary was RE: ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] ISO 11179 Summary was RE: ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Charter update proposal (updated), Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [iso15924-jac] Re: Phonetic orthographies, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Martin Duerst
• Nov 20 2006
• Re: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Charter update proposal (updated), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Charter update proposal (updated), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Charter update proposal (updated), Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Charter update proposal (updated), Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] ISO/FDIS 639-3 tables revised, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
• Nov 19 2006
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: "IETF language code" in Wikipedia, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] "IETF language code" in Wikipedia, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Doug Ewell
• Nov 17 2006
• Re: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Error Correction, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
• Nov 16 2006
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Just checking..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6, John Cowan