ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Sep 20 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Region subtag changes, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Sep 19 2006
• Re: [Ltru] split section 3.1, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] split section 3.1, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] [OT] A language tag parser, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• Sep 18 2006
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] record-jar format draft..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] record-jar format draft..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 15924 process, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 15924 process, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] ISO 15924 process, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] zh-hakka (was: Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Fwd: Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Sep 17 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] record-jar, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] record-jar (was: UTF-8), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
• [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Martin Duerst
• Sep 16 2006
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] [OT] record-jar format draft..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• Sep 15 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere? (Was: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] [OT] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] diffs, changes, etc., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] transcriptions and transliterations, Addison Phillips
• Sep 14 2006
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] IANA and XML (Was: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] [OT] IE7 RC1..., Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value fun..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RE: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), John Cowan
• [Ltru] RE: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Parsabiliy of tags (Was: script tag for IPA, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• RE: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
• Sep 13 2006
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [Tools-discuss] Tiny URLs, Henrik Levkowetz
• [Ltru] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Tiny URLs, Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Tiny URLs, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Preferred-Value fun..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Tiny URLs (was: 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan), Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, John Cowan
• [Ltru] further edits..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Format of the registry, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Format of the registry (Was: RFC 4645 on Initial L anguage Subtag Registry, McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] Two subtags with same description (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: diffs, changes, etc., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• Sep 12 2006
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] UTF-8 (was: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry), Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Format of the registry (Was: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Format of the registry (Was: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-3 description changes, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: diffs, changes, etc., Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Extlangs or not? (was: Re: diffs, changes, etc.), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Comments that refer to "ISO codes", Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: diffs, changes, etc., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: diffs, changes, etc., Frank Ellermann
• Sep 11 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Up-to-date copies of the LSR, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Up-to-date copies of the LSR, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Up-to-date copies of the LSR, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] diffs, changes, etc., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis, version 0, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Up-to-date copies of the LSR, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Up-to-date copies of the LSR, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Fw: Email with attached legal disclaimers, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Up-to-date copies of the LSR, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] 3066ter encompassed languages, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Do we need validating parsers for input? (Was: prefixes fordate variants, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: draft ID nearly ready..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-3 description changes, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: draft ID nearly ready..., Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: draft ID nearly ready..., Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: draft ID nearly ready..., Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", John Cowan
• [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft ID nearly ready..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft ID nearly ready..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: draft ID nearly ready..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] draft ID nearly ready..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-3 description changes (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Up-to-date copies of the LSR, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Deprecated (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] ISO 639-3 description changes (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), Doug Ewell
• Sep 10 2006
• Re: [Ltru] draft ID nearly ready..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: draft ID nearly ready..., Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: draft ID nearly ready..., Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] draft ID nearly ready..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Up-to-date copies of the LSR, John Cowan
• Sep 09 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: prefixes for date variants, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Kent Karlsson
• RE: [Ltru] RFC 4646!! [posted by RFC Editor], McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Kent Karlsson
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Description styles (was: 3066ter encompassed languages), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: prefixes for date variants, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] How many conflicts? (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• Sep 08 2006
• [Ltru] pre-approval for ltru WG -00- internet-draft, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: BCP0047 RFC 4647 on Matching of Language Tags, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: BCP0047 RFC 4646 on Tags for Identifying Languages, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646!!, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: prefixes for date variants, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Do we need validating parsers for input? (Was: prefixes for date variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646!!, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 3066ter encompassed languages, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646!!, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646!!, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] RFC 4646!!, Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] RFC 4646!!, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 3066ter encompassed languages, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: prefixes for date variants, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] 3066ter encompassed languages, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 3066ter encompassed languages, John Cowan
• Sep 07 2006
• RE: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variantsandArmenian dialects), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variantsandArmenian dialects), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: prefixes for date variants, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variantsandArmenian dialects), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variantsandArmenian dialects), Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variantsandArmenian dialects), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Do we need validating parsers for input? (Was: prefixes for date variants, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variantsandArmenian dialects), Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variantsandArmenian dialects), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variants andArmenian dialects), Kent Karlsson
• Sep 06 2006
• [Ltru] WG Action: RECHARTER: Language Tag Registry Update (ltru), IESG Secretary
• RE: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variants a nd Armenian dialects), McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variants and Armenian dialects), John Cowan
• Sep 05 2006
• Re: [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variants and Armenian dialects), Addison Phillips
• Sep 04 2006
• [Ltru] Re: prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variants and Armenian dialects, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] prefixes for date variants (was Re: Generic variants and Armenian dialects), Peter Constable
• Sep 03 2006
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? (Frank Ellermann), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] FW: Generic variants and Armenian dialects, Misha Wolf
• Sep 02 2006
• [Ltru] variant Suppress-Script (was: Request for variant subtags "scouse" and "boont"), Frank Ellermann
• Aug 31 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• Aug 30 2006
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Prefix bug, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Prefix bug, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Prefix bug, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Prefix bug, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, John Cowan
• Aug 29 2006
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Extended language subtags, Frank Ellermann
• Aug 28 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Extended language subtags, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Extended language subtags, Doug Ewell
• Aug 27 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [EAI] New draft for allowing UTF-8 in SMTP responses, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [EAI] New draft for allowing UTF-8 in SMTP responses, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Topic selection, cross-posting, and Subjects, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Stability of lprimary and extended language (was: Re: New item in ISO 639-2 - Zaza), John Cowan
• Aug 26 2006
• RE: [Ltru] Re: New item in ISO 639-2 - Zaza, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Stability of lprimary and extended language (was: Re: New item in ISO 639-2 - Zaza), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: New item in ISO 639-2 - Zaza, Doug Ewell