ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Oct 02 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Frank Ellermann
• Oct 01 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 19, Issue 88, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, David Conrad
• [Ltru] Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 19, Issue 88, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Martin Duerst
• Sep 30 2006
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Re-use of a region code for the same purpose, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Serbia and Montenegro in example, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-script considered least harmful, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Registry deltas, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Re-use of a region code for the same purpose, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• Sep 29 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Crispin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: OT: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] Registry deltas, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], Misha Wolf
• Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: OT: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: OT: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Crispin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Small fix to text on Suppress Script, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
• Sep 28 2006
• [Ltru] OT: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] ADMIN: Enforcement of suspension of posting rights (Re: langauge vs. locale), Harald Alvestrand
• [Ltru] UK redux (was: Re: langauge vs. locale), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese) (was: Re: Suppress-Script batch 1), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Masayasu Ishikawa
• [Ltru] RE: frr, fy, ngo, tt, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Pre-draft-00 for RFC 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: CLDR mysteries solved!, "Reshat Sabiq (ReÅat)"
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script candidates (was: Re: frr, fy, ngo, tt), "Reshat Sabiq (ReÅat)"
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Korean (and Japanese) (was: Re: Suppress-Script batch 1), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] CLDR mysteries solved!, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Frank Ellermann
• Sep 27 2006
• [Ltru] Re: frr, fy, ngo, tt, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, John Cowan
• Sep 26 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] ISO 3166-1 NEWSLETTER No. V-12 ("Serbia" and "Montenegro"), Misha Wolf
• Re: [Ltru] Re: REQUEST for registration of variant subtag 'grabar', John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: REQUEST for registration of variant subtag 'grabar', Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Process, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Process, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Process, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] RE: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: Variant for a Latin-basedalphabet for Id?l-Ural (Qazan) Tatar (iqtel), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness (was: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Process, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Process, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Advice for software; basic well-formedness (was: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes), Martin Duerst
• Sep 25 2006
• RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Process, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Process, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Process, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Available parsers? (Was: Test suite for language tags?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Available parsers? (Was: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Chris Lilley
• [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Chris Lilley
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue (was: Status of draft-4645bis-00), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
• Sep 24 2006
• RE: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Stephen Deach
• Sep 23 2006
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] 4646(bis) typo / issue, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] 4646(bis) typo / issue (was: Status of draft-4645bis-00), Frank Ellermann
• Sep 22 2006
• Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Lisa Dusseault
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Misha Wolf
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Status of draft-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Ned Freed
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Status of draft-4645bis-00, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Status of draft-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] split section 3.1, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML (Clarification), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RS region subtag, John Cowan
• [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Martin Duerst
• Sep 21 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• RE: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, David Conrad
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Proofreading the Registry (was: Re: zh-hakka), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• Sep 20 2006
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Ted Hardie
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Region subtag changes, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
• Sep 19 2006
• Re: [Ltru] split section 3.1, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] split section 3.1, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] [OT] A language tag parser, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• Sep 18 2006
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] record-jar format draft..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] record-jar format draft..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 15924 process, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 15924 process, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] ISO 15924 process, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] zh-hakka (was: Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Fwd: Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Sep 17 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] record-jar, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] record-jar (was: UTF-8), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
• [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Martin Duerst
• Sep 16 2006
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] [OT] record-jar format draft..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• Sep 15 2006
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: [OT] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere? (Was: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] [OT] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] diffs, changes, etc., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] transcriptions and transliterations, Addison Phillips
• Sep 14 2006
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] IANA and XML (Was: RFC 4645 on Initial Language Subtag Registry, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] [OT] IE7 RC1..., Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value fun..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RE: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), John Cowan
• [Ltru] RE: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Parsabiliy of tags (Was: script tag for IPA, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
• RE: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis