ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

May 29 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #48 Hosting of mailing list (Apps #1), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Can a WG member update <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ltru/> ? (Was: Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2), "Martin J. Dürst"

May 28 2009

Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), Stephane Bortzmeyer
[Ltru] Can a WG member update <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ltru/> ? (Was: Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2), Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #48 Hosting of mailing list (Apps #1), Peter Constable

May 27 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Peter Constable
[Ltru] In the interest of moving faster..., Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Marion Gunn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7), CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Randy Presuhn

May 26 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #48 Hosting of mailing list (Apps #1), CE Whitehead
[Ltru] [Fwd: Fwd: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsawg-operations-and-management (Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management of New Protocols and Protocol Extensions) to BCP], "Martin J. Dürst"

May 24 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), "Martin J. Dürst"

May 24 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #48 Hosting of mailing list (Apps #1), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #48 Hosting of mailing list (Apps #1), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #48 Hosting of mailing list (Apps #1), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Alexey Melnikov

May 20 2009

Re: [Ltru] draft-22 submitted..., Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] draft-22 submitted..., "Martin J. Dürst"

May 19 2009

Re: [Ltru] Draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-22//Issue#40//Section 3.4-point 16, Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
[Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-22.txt, Internet-Drafts
[Ltru] draft-22 submitted..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Editors, please produce draft-22, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, "Martin J. Dürst"

May 18 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] editor copy progress..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] can't find a reference for ticket #31, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence in Section 2.2.9, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence in Section 2.2.9, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re-opening issue #40 (was: ABSOLUTELY intolerable), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 40: Re: Section 3.4-16 on ISO 3166 vs UN M49, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Editors, please produce draft-22, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] can't find a reference for ticket #31, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence in Section 2.2.9, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Well-formed processors (was: Re: Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Well-formed processors (was: Re: Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] Draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-22//Issue#40//Section 3.4-point 16, Lang Gérard
[Ltru] Editors, please produce draft-22, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] can't find a reference for ticket #31, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] can't find a reference for ticket #31, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence in Section 2.2.9, "Martin J. Dürst"
[Ltru] Issue 40: Re: Section 3.4-16 on ISO 3166 vs UN M49 RE: Ltru Digest, Vol 50, Issue 42, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] ABSOLUTELY intolerable, "Martin J. Dürst"
[Ltru] Re-opening issue #40 (was: ABSOLUTELY intolerable), Randy Presuhn

May 17 2009

Re: [Ltru] ABSOLUTELY intolerable, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] ABSOLUTELY intolerable, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Doug Ewell

May 16 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, CE Whitehead

May 15 2009

Re: [Ltru] can't find a reference for ticket #31, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] can't find a reference for ticket #31, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #41: AD Issue #8: section 3.5 SHOULD vs. MUST, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #43: AD Issue #10: File-Date value, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UNM.49, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #36: AD Issue #3: rules for UN M.49 codes, Randy Presuhn

May 14 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, CE Whitehead

May 13 2009

Re: [Ltru] [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis(Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis(Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Doug Ewell

May 12 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, John Cowan
[Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235233] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis (Update to the Language Subtag Registry) to Informational RFC, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Kent Karlsson

May 11 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis

May 08 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, CE Whitehead

May 06 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Randy Presuhn

May 05 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Mark Davis
[Ltru] Fw: Alexey's Apps Area Activity Report for April 2009, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available, Phillips, Addison

May 04 2009

Re: [Ltru] Section 3.4-16 on ISO 3166 vs UN M49 RE: Ltru Digest, Vol 50, Issue 42, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Section 3.4-16 on ISO 3166 vs UN M49 RE: Ltru Digest, Vol 50, Issue 42, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
[Ltru] Section 3.4-16 on ISO 3166 vs UN M49 RE: Ltru Digest, Vol 50, Issue 42, Lang Gérard
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis

May 03 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5extlang mapping, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Doug Ewell

May 02 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, CE Whitehead

May 01 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] zh-Latn-CN-variant1-a-extend1-x-wadegile, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] zh-Latn-CN-variant1-a-extend1-x-wadegile, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] zh-Latn-CN-variant1-a-extend1-x-wadegile, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] zh-Latn-CN-variant1-a-extend1-x-wadegile, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] It MUST and SHALL be preserved, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] It MUST and SHALL be preserved, Randy Presuhn

Apr 30 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #43: AD Issue #10: File-Date value, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #43: AD Issue #10: File-Date value, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs.UNM.49, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue summary, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs.UNM.49, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue summary, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5extlang mapping, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UNM.49, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UNM.49, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #47: AD Issue #14: section 3.1.2 confusing text on replacement tags, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] It MUST and SHALL be preserved, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UNM.49, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #46: AD Issue #13: MAY->can in 4.6, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #44: AD Issue #11: informative reference to MIME, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #42: AD Issue #9: confusing future tense, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #41: AD Issue #8: section 3.5 SHOULD vs. MUST, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #34, AD Issue #1: who scrutinizes primary subtags rejected by ISO 639/RA-JAC, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #34, AD Issue #1: who scrutinizes primary subtags rejected by ISO 639/RA-JAC, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #34, AD Issue #1: who scrutinizes primary subtags rejected by ISO 639/RA-JAC, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #39: AD Issues #6: field name occurance limit, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence inSection2.2.9, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence in Section2.2.9, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence in Section2.2.9, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #36: AD Issue #3: rules for UN M.49 codes, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #36: AD Issue #3: rules for UN M.49 codes, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #35, AD Issue #2: what is meant by "permanently reserved", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] [OT] Language icon, John Cowan
[Ltru] [OT] Language icon, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] can't find a reference for ticket #31, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Phillips, Addison

Apr 29 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Mark Davis
[Ltru] can't find a reference for ticket #31, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #41: AD Issue #8: section 3.5 SHOULD vs. MUST, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #42: AD Issue #9: confusing future tense, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #41: AD Issue #8: section 3.5 SHOULD vs. MUST, John Cowan
[Ltru] Ticket #41: AD Issue #8: section 3.5 SHOULD vs. MUST, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #39: AD Issues #6: field name occurance limit, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #47: AD Issue #14: section 3.1.2 confusing text on replacement tags, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #46: AD Issue #13: MAY->can in 4.6, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #45: AD Issue #12: reason for SHOULD in 4.5 extlang mapping, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #44: AD Issue #11: informative reference to MIME, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #43: AD Issue #10: File-Date value, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, "Martin J. Dürst"
[Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence in Section 2.2.9, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #36: AD Issue #3: rules for UN M.49 codes, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #35, AD Issue #2: what is meant by "permanently reserved", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #34, AD Issue #1: who scrutinizes primary subtags rejected by ISO 639/RA-JAC, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Phillips, Addison

Apr 28 2009

Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Gen-Art review for 4645bis (was: no subject), "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, "Martin J. Dürst"
[Ltru] Fw: 75th IETF - Working Group/BOF Scheduling, Randy Presuhn

Apr 27 2009

Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] (no subject), McCann Peter-A001034

Apr 16 2009

[Ltru] Fw: Review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10, Randy Presuhn

Apr 16 2009

[Ltru] Fw: Review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10, Randy Presuhn

Apr 13 2009

[Ltru] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, The IESG
Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Doug Ewell

Apr 12 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Don Osborn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #42 (AD comment #9) confusing future tense, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note, Mark Davis

Apr 11 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] (AD comment #0) reviewer appointment, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Michael Everson
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Issue #47 (AD comment #14) section 3.1.2 confusing text on replacement tags, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Alexey Melnikov
[Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Alexey Melnikov
[Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Issue #42 (AD comment #9) confusing future tense, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, John Cowan
[Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Alexey Melnikov
[Ltru] Issue #40 (AD comment #7) section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs UN M.49, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #39 (AD comment #6) field name occurance limit, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, Alexey Melnikov
[Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Alexey Melnikov

Apr 10 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis (Update to the Language Subtag Registry) to Informational RFC, The IESG
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, "Martin J. Dürst"

Apr 09 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] one co-editor on vacation..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Randy Presuhn

Apr 08 2009

Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Don Osborn
[Ltru] Fw: AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Randy Presuhn

Apr 06 2009

Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Doug Ewell

Apr 02 2009

[Ltru] Regex, Mark Davis

Apr 01 2009

Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, "Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Mark Davis

Mar 23 2009

[Ltru] Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: New FAQ on IETF Copyright Policy available (FYI), Randy Presuhn

Mar 17 2009

Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Gerard Meijssen
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Peter Constable

Mar 13 2009

Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Political motivation (was: Re: Geocoordinates), Doug Ewell

Mar 13 2009

Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Doug Ewell

Mar 12 2009

[Ltru] ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Wild card prefixes, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Doug Ewell

Mar 11 2009

Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 and LTRU continuation [was: Geocoordinates], Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Peter Constable

Mar 10 2009

Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 and LTRU continuation, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 and LTRU continuation [was: Geocoordinates], John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 and LTRU continuation [was: Geocoordinates], Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates (was: Re: Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU), Stephane Bortzmeyer

Mar 09 2009

Re: [Ltru] document status, Mark Davis
[Ltru] document status, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates (was: Re: Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU), Mark Davis

Mar 03 2009

Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Randy Presuhn

Mar 03 2009

Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Tex Texin
Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Tex Texin
Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Tex Texin

Mar 02 2009

Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Shepherding writeup for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis, Martin Duerst
[Ltru] Shepherding writeup for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis, Martin Duerst
[Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Debbie Garside
[Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Tex Texin
Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, John Cowan

Mar 01 2009

Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Peter Constable

Feb 27 2009

[Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Fw: Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4, 2009, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Martin Duerst

Feb 26 2009

Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, John Cowan
[Ltru] FYI: validating, Mark Davis
[Ltru] status of draft-21, Phillips, Addison

Feb 25 2009

[Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [Ltru] Please submit the 4646bis draft, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Please submit the 4646bis draft, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content- TODAY, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Fw: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content- TODAY, Gerard Meijssen
[Ltru] Fw: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content- TODAY, Randy Presuhn

Feb 24 2009

Re: [Ltru] Changes to ISO 15924, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #31: change titles of ISO docs, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #31: change titles of ISO docs, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] Fw: Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Changes to ISO 15924, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #28: use ASCII hyphen, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 25: change description of 'ngf', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Randy Presuhn

Feb 23 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #22: Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] [xml2rfc] New trust boilerplate dated 2009-02-12, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Fw: Version of xml2rfc to produce drafts with new pre5378 IPR clause, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] [xml2rfc] New trust boilerplate dated 2009-02-12, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Fwd: Re: [xml2rfc] New trust boilerplate dated 2009-02-12, Martin Duerst
[Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn

Feb 22 2009

Re: [Ltru] Possible issue: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] Possible issue: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell

Feb 21 2009

Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson

Mail converted by MHonArc