ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• May 03 2005
• [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: regionalisation, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: regionalisation, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: regionalisation, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 5 - Appendix D: Redundant Tags, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF (was: Open points before -02), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: regionalisation, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Open tickets on initial registry, Doug Ewell
• May 02 2005
• [Ltru] Re: 5 - Appendix D: Redundant Tags, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] 5 - Appendix D: Redundant Tags (was: Open points before -02), Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] 3 - Simplified registry ABNF (was: Open points before -02), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] 3 - Simplified registry ABNF (was: Open points before -02), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] 5 - Appendix D: Redundant Tags (was: Open points before -02), Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Last registry for now, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, Marion Gunn
• RE: [Ltru] Last registry for now, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Last registry for now, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Last registry for now, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Open points before -02, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: New registry with Suppress_Script, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Last registry for now, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] regionalisation, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Open tickets on initial registry, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: New registry with Suppress_Script, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: New registry with Suppress_Script, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Open points before -02, Frank Ellermann
• May 01 2005
• Re: [Ltru] Re: New registry with Suppress_Script, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Open tickets on initial registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: New registry with Suppress_Script, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, Doug Ewell
• Apr 30 2005
• Re: [Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Doug Ewell
• Apr 29 2005
• [Ltru] Fw: Area Advisor Changes, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 28 2005
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: aaa-bbb-ccc-ddd-eee-fff-ggg-hhh-Latn-US-boont, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• Apr 27 2005
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] aaa-bbb-ccc-ddd-eee-fff-ggg-hhh-Latn-US-boont (was: -01 nits), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: -01 nits, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] aaa-bbb-ccc-ddd-eee-fff-ggg-hhh-Latn-US-boont (was: -01 nits), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: -01 nits, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: -01 nits, Frank Ellermann
• Apr 26 2005
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] -01 nits, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] -01 nits, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] [submission] draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] -01 nits, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Charter Debates?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Charter Debates?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] -01 nits, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: -01 nits, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: -01 nits, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: -01 nits, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, L.Gillam
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, John Cowan
• [Ltru] ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot, L.Gillam
• [Ltru] Submitting Drafts (was: Re: -01 nits), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: -01 nits, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] -01 nits, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] (need approval) Working Group submission: LTRU registry draft-01, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: (need approval) Working Group submission: LTRU registry draft-01, Martin Duerst
• Apr 25 2005
• [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus, James Cloos
• [Ltru] (need approval) Working Group submission: LTRU registry draft-01, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus, James Cloos
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• Apr 24 2005
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021 (was: Moving Forward), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021 (was: Moving Forward), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021 (was: Moving Forward), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Open tickets on initial registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Miscellaneous registry details, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021 (was: Moving Forward), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: BCP 47, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021 (was: Moving Forward), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus (was: new version posted online), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: New registry with Suppress_Script, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: BCP 47, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Support of JAVA, Jefsey Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus (was: new version posted online), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: FWS vs. LWSP, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus, Frank Ellermann
• Apr 23 2005
• RE: [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus (was: new version posted online), McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] Re: FWS vs. LWSP (was: new version posted online), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: hyphen-minus (was: new version posted online), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] BCP 47, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: 003 vs. 021, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] 003 vs. 021 (was: Moving Forward), John Cowan
• [Ltru] 003 vs. 021 (was: Moving Forward), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] BCP 47 (was: Support of JAVA), Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Support of JAVA, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Support of JAVA, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Apr 22 2005
• RE: [Ltru] Support of JAVA, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Support of JAVA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Support of JAVA, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Marion Gunn
• Apr 21 2005
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] How should "fa" be handled in the future?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: New version posted: ready for publication??, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, John Cowan
• [Ltru] [OT] How should "fa" be handled in the future?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] in practice only 25 (was: New version posted: ready for publication??), Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Marion Gunn
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] edits posted, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Addison Phillips
• Apr 20 2005
• [Ltru] New version posted: ready for publication??, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] hyphen-minus (was: new version posted online), Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] hyphen-minus (was: new version posted online), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Apr 19 2005
• RE: [Ltru] Re: New registry with Suppress_Script, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: New registry with Suppress_Script, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] FWS vs. LWSP (was: new version posted online), Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] hyphen-minus (was: new version posted online), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] hyphen-minus (was: new version posted online), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] subtle ABNF (was: new version posted online), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] New registry with Suppress_Script, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] RE: Generic variant subtags in RFC 3066bis, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] RE: Generic variant subtags in RFC 3066bis, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Addison Phillips
• Apr 18 2005
• [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] considerations for ISO 639-6 at consensus? (was:newversionposted online), Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] considerations for ISO 639-6 at consensus? (was:newversion posted online), Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] considerations for ISO 639-6 at consensus? (was:newversionposted online), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] considerations for ISO 639-6 at consensus? (was:newversion posted online), Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress & Require Script, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] considerations for ISO 639-6 at consensus? (was: newversion posted online), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress & Require Script, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] new version posted online, McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress & Require Script, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] considerations for ISO 639-6 at consensus? (was: newversion posted online), Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] considerations for ISO 639-6 at consensus? (was: new version posted online), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: new version posted online, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] new version posted online, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress & Require Script, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress & Require Script, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Supress & Require Script, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] new version posted online, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] "Pitting" (was: Re: [psg.com #882]), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Supress & Require Script, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress & Require Script, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Supress & Require Script, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Supress & Require Script, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Supress & Require Script, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 17 2005
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Doug Ewell
• Re: Off Topic (was Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Apr 16 2005
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, John Cowan
• Re: Off Topic (was Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• Apr 15 2005
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: Off Topic (was Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), L.Gillam
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Erkki Kolehmainen
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
• Apr 14 2005
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Fw: Outages on IETF servers in the near future, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh-Bopo?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] zh-Bopo?, Misha Wolf
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, John Cowan
• Re: Off Topic (was Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Doug Ewell
• Re: Off Topic (was Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), L.Gillam
• Off Topic (was Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, L.Gillam
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
• Re: field for indicating script (was RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Default script sine qua non, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Default script sine qua non, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Default script sine qua non, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Default script sine qua non, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Default script sine qua non, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: OT - RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), Frank Ellermann
• Apr 13 2005
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, ned . freed
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Markus Scherer
• Re: field for indicating script (was RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• field for indicating script (was RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Default script sine qua non (was: Moving Forward), Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #877] move section (appendix C) on registryinitialization to IANA considerations, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, McDonald, Ira
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #876] what should the format of the initial registry be?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #886] registry should add French translations, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Moving Forward, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
• RE: [Ltru] OT: Cultural imperialism?, Misha Wolf
• OT - RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., L.Gillam
• Re: [Ltru] A Modest Proposal, Tex Texin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Tex Texin
• Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., John Cowan
• Off Topic (was Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] Moving Forward, Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] OT: A Modest Proposal, L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] OT: A Modest Proposal, Misha Wolf
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] OT: A Modest Proposal, L.Gillam
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., L.Gillam
• [Ltru] [OT] Linguasphere, L.Gillam
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Tex Texin
• Re: [Ltru] A Modest Proposal, Tex Texin
• [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Moving Forward, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: date B = 2005-01-01, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: date B = 2005-01-01, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: date B = 2005-01-01, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #887] references to 3066 and 1766 should beinformative, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] IANA update trough RFC, Jefsey Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #883] language tag reviewers should be elected, rather than appointed, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #889] registry should be consistent with ISOlists, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #890] include character set information in tags, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, Peter Constable
• Apr 12 2005
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Moving Forward, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Moving Forward, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: IANA update trough RFC, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] Moving Forward, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Moving Forward, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] IANA update trough RFC, Jefsey Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] IANA update trough RFC, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: date B = 2005-01-01, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] A Modest Proposal, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] M. Morfin's attempt to undermine me with my employer, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] OT: A Modest Proposal, Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] A Modest Proposal, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] M. Morfin's attempt to undermine me with my employer, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] M. Morfin's attempt to undermine me with my employer, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] date B = 2005-01-01, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: date B = 2005-01-01, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] [slightly OT] Linguasphere (was Great Script Debate Part II:Formats...), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] M. Morfin's attempt to undermine me with my employer, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] [slightly OT] Linguasphere (was Great Script Debate Part II:Formats...), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] [slightly OT] Linguasphere (was Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-6, Scott Hollenbeck
• [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Script debate closed by Chinese tags, McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] date B = 2005-01-01, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] attempt to undermine me with my employer, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-6, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats.. .), McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] date B = 2005-01-01, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] M. Morfin's attempt to undermine me with my employer, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-6, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats...), Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Is there a consensus ? (was: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, L.Gillam
• [Ltru] Re: Is there a consensus ? (was: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] New registry 2005-04-08, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-Englishfields from ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Robin Cover
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfromISO documents, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfromISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-Englishfieldsfrom ISO documents, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
• Apr 11 2005
• Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] language or price tag ?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove regionsubtag 200), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Formal request for action by the LTRU Chair, Randy Presuhn