ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

Apr 11 2005

Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Mark Davis
RE: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISOdocuments, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove regionsubtag 200), Randy Presuhn
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
[Ltru] Great Script Debate Part II: Formats..., Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: e-GB-scouse (was: Matching metrics), Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: New registry 2005-04-08, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: New registry 2005-04-08, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Is there a consensus ? (was: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200)), Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISOdocuments, Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] language or price tag ?, L.Gillam
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] New registry 2005-04-08, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] e-GB-scouse (was: Matching metrics), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] New registry 2005-04-08, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] language or price tag ?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] Is there a consensus ? (was: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200)), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] language or price tag ?, L.Gillam
RE: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), L.Gillam
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISO documents, L.Gillam
[Ltru] New registry 2005-04-08, Doug Ewell
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, L.Gillam
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), L.Gillam
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, Jukka K. Korpela
[Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Apr 10 2005

[Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Formal request for action by the LTRU Chair, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] language or price tag ?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), John Cowan
[Ltru] BCP 47 (was: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP)), Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, L.Gillam
[Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] language or price tag ?, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, Jukka K. Korpela
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
RE: [Ltru] seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Apr 09 2005

RE: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISOdocuments, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] language or price tag ?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #881] remove registrant information from registry, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] seeking resolution of the Great Script Debate, Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Randy Presuhn
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISOdocuments, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Misha Wolf
Re: [Ltru] language or price tag ?, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #881] remove registrant information from registry, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #907] Question about some draft text., Randy Presuhn
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
[Ltru] language or price tag ?, Jefsey Morfin
[Ltru] ISO 639, ISO 3166 and ISO 15924 BCP 047 subtags supports., Jefsey Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), McDonald, Ira
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISOdocuments, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] interesting IETF archives on language tags, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISOdocuments, Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Format for extension registry, Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields fromISO documents, Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling, Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., Mark Davis
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Comment: use VU for Vanuatu (was: remove region subtag 200), Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: remove region subtag 200, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Script prefixes (was: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP)), Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields fromISOdocuments, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, ned . freed
[Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: Format for extension registry, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, ned . freed

Apr 08 2005

RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: draft review, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, ned . freed
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
[Ltru] Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-content-script-01.txt, Randy Presuhn
RE: [Ltru] Using RT, ned . freed
RE: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., McDonald, Ira
RE: [Ltru] Re: draft review, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, McDonald, Ira
Re: [Ltru] Format for extension registry, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] Format for extension registry, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Question about some draft text., Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), McDonald, Ira
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents bemade into an internet-draft?, Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCIIrepresentationofnative name of language, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representationofnative name of language, rt+ltru-registry
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representationofnative name of language, rt+ltru-registry
Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parentorganizationdeprecations, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be madeinto an internet-draft?, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: draft review, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representation ofnative name of language, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] registry should be bilingual, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Prepare for a burst of issue-tracker messages, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] draft review, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, John Cowan
[Ltru] OT - Traffic, Debbie Garside
Re: [Ltru] Re: propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Mark Davis
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representation of native name of language, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] draft review, Mark Davis
[Ltru] Re: draft review, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtagswithdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #899] remove region subtag 172, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #899] remove region subtag 172, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #896] change descriptions for region subtagswithdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #896] change descriptions for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: e[n]-GB-scouse (was: Matching metrics), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
Re: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents bemade into an internet-draft?, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtagswithdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Using RT, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, rt+ltru-registry
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, rt+ltru-registry
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, rt+ltru-registry
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, rt+ltru-registry
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, rt+ltru-registry
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, rt+ltru-registry
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents bemade into an internet-draft?, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Using RT, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #905] update IPR boilerplate, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #906] reference to ABNF needs update, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #906] reference to ABNF needs update, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #905] update IPR boilerplate, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #901] add "Deprecated" field, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #901] add "Deprecated" field, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #899] remove region subtag 172, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #899] remove region subtag 172, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #897] change canonical values to match ISO 3166:1998 for region subtags withdrawn after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #897] change canonical values to match ISO 3166:1998 for region subtags withdrawn after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #896] change descriptions for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #896] change descriptions for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #894] AutoReply: add figure-of-merit matching, rt+ltru-matching
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #892] instructions for IANA if registry becomes "too large", rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #895] remove region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 before 1988, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #895] remove region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 before 1988, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #893] support incremental updates of registry shadows, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #893] support incremental updates of registry shadows, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representation of native name of language, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representation of native name of language, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #888] ietf-languages mailing list is not the IANA list presented in RFC 3066, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #889] registry should be consistent with ISO lists, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #889] registry should be consistent with ISO lists, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #888] ietf-languages mailing list is not the IANA list presented in RFC 3066, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #890] include character set information in tags, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #890] include character set information in tags, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #887] references to 3066 and 1766 should be informative, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #887] references to 3066 and 1766 should be informative, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #886] registry should add French translations, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #886] registry should add French translations, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #885] split references between normative and informative, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #885] split references between normative and informative, rt+ltru-registry
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
[Ltru] interesting IETF archives on language tags, Jefsey Morfin
[Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann

Apr 07 2005

RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] Re: propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Misha Wolf
[Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: clarify "i-default" and "und", Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] draft review, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] Re: fix ABNF bugs, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantivecommentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, John Cowan
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] "talking" to RT and duplicate messages, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, John Cowan
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #883] language tag reviewers should be elected, rather than appointed, rt+ltru-registry
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #883] language tag reviewers should be elected, rather than appointed, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #884] remove dead references, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #884] remove dead references, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
RE: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
Re: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #878] should the initial registry contents i-d be published as an RFC?, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #878] should the initial registry contents i-d be published as an RFC?, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #881] remove registrant information from registry, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #881] remove registrant information from registry, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #877] move section (appendix C) on registry initialization to IANA considerations, rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #877] move section (appendix C) on registry initialization to IANA considerations, rt+ltru-registry
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantivecommentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #876] what whould the format of the initial registry be?, rt+ltru-initial
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #876] what whould the format of the initial registry be?, rt+ltru-initial
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be madeinto an internet-draft?, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #873]: wording about grandfathered tags' canonical values inconsistent, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #872]: are grandfathered tags allowed to have canonical value?, Randy Presuhn
RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Misha Wolf
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Using RT to view ltru issues, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
[Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Misha Wolf
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Misha Wolf
RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Scott Hollenbeck
RE: [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., McDonald, Ira
Re: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-r egistry-01, John Cowan
[Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, McDonald, Ira
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), McDonald, Ira
RE: [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-r egistry-01, McDonald, Ira
Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] e-GB-scouse (was: Matching metrics), Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), McDonald, Ira
Re: [Ltru] draft review, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments ondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Scott Hollenbeck
[Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] cowan-03 / cowan-06 (was: John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01), Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Case-sensitive canonicalisation, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments ondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Mark Davis
[Ltru] [psg.com #892] instructions for IANA if registry becomes "too large", rt+ltru-registry
[Ltru] Prepare for a burst of issue-tracker messages, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling, Peter Constable
[Ltru] Case-sensitive canonicalisation, Jon Hanna
[Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling, Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jarformat), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP) (RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling, John Cowan
[Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan

Apr 06 2005

[Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format - smart matching?, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling, Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jarformat), Randy Presuhn
RE: [Ltru] updated editor's copies..., Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] updated editor's copies..., Scott Hollenbeck
[Ltru] updated editor's copies..., Addison Phillips
RE: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP) (RE: [Ltru] Re:Registry in record-jar format), Addison Phillips
Compatibility with existing use (LDAP) (RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format), Kurt D. Zeilenga
Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] New registry, Misha Wolf
RE: [Ltru] New registry, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] RE: +AFs-Ltru+AF0- Re: +AFs-Ltru+AF0- Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] New registry, Misha Wolf
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format - smart matching?, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] New registry, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format - smart matching?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format - smart matching?, L.Gillam
RE: [Ltru] Proposed changes to region subtags, Misha Wolf
[Ltru] Re: +AFs-Ltru+AF0- Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] CRLF vs. LF, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, John Cowan
[Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Matching metrics (was: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Matching metrics (was: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Matching metrics (was: Registry in record-jar format), John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling, L.Gillam

Apr 05 2005

Re: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] LTRU participation and warning, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Matching metrics (was: Registry in record-jar format), Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: Fw: Protocol Action: 'Augmented BNF for SyntaxSpecifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Scott Hollenbeck
[Ltru] Re: Fw: Protocol Action: 'Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
Re: [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jarformat), Mark Davis
[Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format., Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Alternative matching algorithms (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] draft review, Jefsey Morfin

Apr 04 2005

[Ltru] draft review, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, John Cowan
[Ltru] Fw: Protocol Action: 'Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format., Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, McDonald, Ira
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format., Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format, Misha Wolf
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Frank Ellermann
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, John Cowan
RE: [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format., McDonald, Ira
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Debbie Garside
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Alternative matching algorithm, Misha Wolf
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, John Cowan
[Ltru] Fw: Enforcement of Updated IPR Boilerplate, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format., Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags (incorporating"wiskey"), Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Addison Phillips
Re: [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Frank Ellermann
RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Peter Constable

Apr 03 2005

Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Mark Davis
[Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format., Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Mark Davis
RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, John Cowan
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format., Jon Hanna
[Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags (incorporating "wiskey"), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, Debbie Garside
RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, Debbie Garside
RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, Misha Wolf
RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, Debbie Garside
Re: [Ltru] Re: is there some wiskey in the jar, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Registry in record-jar format, Debbie Garside
[Ltru] Re: is there some wiskey in the jar, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format, Frank Ellermann

Mail converted by MHonArc