ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Apr 29 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, "Martin J. Dürst"
• [Ltru] Ticket #40: AD Issue #7: section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs. UN M.49, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Ticket #37: AD Issue #4: delete last sentence in Section 2.2.9, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Ticket #36: AD Issue #3: rules for UN M.49 codes, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Ticket #35, AD Issue #2: what is meant by "permanently reserved", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Ticket #34, AD Issue #1: who scrutinizes primary subtags rejected by ISO 639/RA-JAC, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Ticket #38, AD issue #5: ABNF vs UTF-8, Phillips, Addison
• Apr 28 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Gen-Art review for 4645bis (was: no subject), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, "Martin J. Dürst"
• [Ltru] Fw: 75th IETF - Working Group/BOF Scheduling, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 27 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Fw: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] (no subject), McCann Peter-A001034
• Apr 16 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: Review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 16 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: Review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 13 2009
• [Ltru] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP, The IESG
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Doug Ewell
• Apr 12 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Don Osborn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, "Martin J. DÃrst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #42 (AD comment #9) confusing future tense, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note, Mark Davis
• Apr 11 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] (AD comment #0) reviewer appointment, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Issue #47 (AD comment #14) section 3.1.2 confusing text on replacement tags, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Issue #42 (AD comment #9) confusing future tense, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Issue #40 (AD comment #7) section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs UN M.49, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #39 (AD comment #6) field name occurance limit, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Alexey Melnikov
• Apr 10 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis (Update to the Language Subtag Registry) to Informational RFC, The IESG
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Apr 09 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] one co-editor on vacation..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, "Martin J. DÃrst"
• Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, "Martin J. DÃrst"
• Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 08 2009
• Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?, Don Osborn
• [Ltru] Fw: AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 06 2009
• Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Doug Ewell
• Apr 02 2009
• [Ltru] Regex, Mark Davis
• Apr 01 2009
• Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, "Martin J. DÃrst"
• Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Mark Davis
• Mar 23 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: New FAQ on IETF Copyright Policy available (FYI), Randy Presuhn
• Mar 17 2009
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Peter Constable
• Mar 13 2009
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Political motivation (was: Re: Geocoordinates), Doug Ewell
• Mar 13 2009
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Doug Ewell
• Mar 12 2009
• [Ltru] ISO 639-6, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Wild card prefixes, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Doug Ewell
• Mar 11 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 and LTRU continuation [was: Geocoordinates], Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 (was: Geocoordinates), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Peter Constable
• Mar 10 2009
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 and LTRU continuation, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 and LTRU continuation [was: Geocoordinates], John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 and LTRU continuation [was: Geocoordinates], Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates (was: Re: Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Mar 09 2009
• Re: [Ltru] document status, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] document status, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates (was: Re: Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU), Mark Davis
• Mar 03 2009
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Randy Presuhn
• Mar 03 2009
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Tex Texin
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Tex Texin
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Tex Texin
• Mar 02 2009
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Shepherding writeup for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Shepherding writeup for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Tex Texin
• Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, John Cowan
• Mar 01 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Peter Constable
• Feb 27 2009
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Fw: Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4, 2009, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Martin Duerst
• Feb 26 2009
• Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] FYI: validating, John Cowan
• [Ltru] FYI: validating, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] status of draft-21, Phillips, Addison
• Feb 25 2009
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] Please submit the 4646bis draft, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Please submit the 4646bis draft, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content- TODAY, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content- TODAY, Gerard Meijssen
• [Ltru] Fw: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content- TODAY, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 24 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to ISO 15924, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #31: change titles of ISO docs, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #31: change titles of ISO docs, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Fw: Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Changes to ISO 15924, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #28: use ASCII hyphen, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 25: change description of 'ngf', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 23 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #22: Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [xml2rfc] New trust boilerplate dated 2009-02-12, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Fw: Version of xml2rfc to produce drafts with new pre5378 IPR clause, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [xml2rfc] New trust boilerplate dated 2009-02-12, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Fwd: Re: [xml2rfc] New trust boilerplate dated 2009-02-12, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Issue #30: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 22 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Possible issue: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Possible issue: remove "first edition" from titles of standards, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Feb 21 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #28: use ASCII hyphen, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day', Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Current open issues, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue 25: change description of 'ngf', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Feb 20 2009
• [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Feb 18 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 40, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Narrowing of YU and title of ISO 639-2 (was: Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 40), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 40, Lang Gérard
• [Ltru] IPR for draft-4645bis (was: Re: Issue Tracker), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Martin Duerst
• Feb 17 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 16 2009
• Re: [Ltru] issue #1 resolution, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] idnits and editor's copy posted, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue #1 resolution[was: RE: IPR mumbles..], Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft-21 prep: minor XML changes..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue #3 resolution, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] IPR mumbles.., Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] IPR mumbles.., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 15 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Phillips, Addison
• Feb 14 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #23: incorporate 639-3 updates as of 2009-02-13, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #21: add "International Sign" to registry content, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Doug Ewell
• Feb 13 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (WasPreferred-Value for YU), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (WasPreferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Another draft-4645bis needed, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #23: incorporate 639-3 updates as of 2009-02-13, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #21: add "International Sign" to registry content, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Another draft-4645bis needed, Doug Ewell
• Feb 12 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #19: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #17: relationship guarantee, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #16: Romanian/Modolvan example, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #15: uz-Zxxx example, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #14: change "follow" to "consult", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #13: "two authorities", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #12: primary language SHOULD, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #11: use of word "response", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #10: truncation, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #8: "language priority list", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #7: change "if when", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #6: change "the ones", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #5: change "apply", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #3: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #2: move 2860 ref to informative, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #1: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] [LTRU]Preferred-Value for YU, CE Whitehead
• Feb 11 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Channel Islands background material (was: Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 28), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 24, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 10 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #19: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #17: relationship guarantee, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #16: Romanian/Modolvan example, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #15: uz-Zxxx example, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #14: change "follow" to "consult", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #13: "two authorities", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #12: primary language SHOULD, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #11: use of word "response", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #10: truncation, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #8: "language priority list", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #7: change "if when", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #4: change "than", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #6: change "the ones", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #5: change "apply", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #3: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #2: move 2860 ref to informative, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Issue #1: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 21/// E: Channel Islands and co, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
• Feb 09 2009
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 2, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move 2860 ref to informative, Martin Duerst
• Feb 08 2009
• Re: [Ltru] "different from" issue & other editorial decisions (was Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d ), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: relationship guarantee, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: Romanian/Modolvan example, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: uz-Zxxx example, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: change "follow" to "consult", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: primary language SHOULD, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: "two authorities", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: use of word "response", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: truncation, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] issue: "language priority list", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] change "if when", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] change "than", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] change "the ones", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] change "apply", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] "different from" issue, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move 2860 ref to informative, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft-21 mod: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, John Cowan
• Feb 07 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bisi-d, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 06 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Edith Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Edith Whitehead
• [Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 05 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
• Feb 03 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 03 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 2, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., CE Whitehead
• Feb 02 2009
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-09.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 1, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Martin Duerst
• Jan 31 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Doug Ewell
• Jan 30 2009
• [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
• [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell
• Jan 28 2009
• [Ltru] Fwd: IAB Response to an Appeal from J-F C. Morfin dd 29 September 2008, Martin Duerst
• Jan 25 2009
• [Ltru] Fwd: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your comments on revisedproposed legend text to work-around the Pre-5378 Problem, Martin Duerst
• Jan 24 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, CE Whitehead
• Jan 22 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Moving ahead, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Jan 14 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review andcomments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
• Jan 14 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review and comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
• Jan 09 2009
• [Ltru] Fwd: RFC Errata Update for Working Group Chairs, Randy Presuhn
• Dec 22 2008
• [Ltru] Fw: 74th IETF - Working Groups/BOF Scheduling, Randy Presuhn
• Dec 19 2008
• [Ltru] Fw: RFC 5378 Contributor License Form, Randy Presuhn
• Dec 19 2008
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn
• Dec 18 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Request for clarification (Was: requiring full prefixes) (I made a minor correction to my previous post)‏, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Moving ahead, Martin Duerst
• Dec 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Phillips, Addison