ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

Feb 21 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day', Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day', Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Current open issues, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs', Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #28: use ASCII hyphen, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day', Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] Current open issues, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue 25: change description of 'ngf', Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell

Feb 20 2009

[Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] Issue #24: Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
[Ltru] Add ISO 639-5 Web references to draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell

Feb 18 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 40, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Narrowing of YU and title of ISO 639-2 (was: Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 40), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 40, Lang Gérard
[Ltru] IPR for draft-4645bis (was: Re: Issue Tracker), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Martin Duerst

Feb 17 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn

Feb 16 2009

Re: [Ltru] issue #1 resolution, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] idnits and editor's copy posted, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue #1 resolution[was: RE: IPR mumbles..], Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] draft-21 prep: minor XML changes..., Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue #3 resolution, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] IPR mumbles.., Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] IPR mumbles.., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn

Feb 15 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Phillips, Addison

Feb 14 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #23: incorporate 639-3 updates as of 2009-02-13, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #21: add "International Sign" to registry content, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Doug Ewell

Feb 13 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (WasPreferred-Value for YU), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (WasPreferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Another draft-4645bis needed, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #23: incorporate 639-3 updates as of 2009-02-13, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #21: add "International Sign" to registry content, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Another draft-4645bis needed, Doug Ewell

Feb 12 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #19: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #17: relationship guarantee, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #16: Romanian/Modolvan example, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #15: uz-Zxxx example, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #14: change "follow" to "consult", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #13: "two authorities", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #12: primary language SHOULD, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #11: use of word "response", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #10: truncation, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #8: "language priority list", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #7: change "if when", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #6: change "the ones", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #5: change "apply", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #3: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #2: move 2860 ref to informative, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #1: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] [LTRU]Preferred-Value for YU, CE Whitehead

Feb 11 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, CE Whitehead
[Ltru] Channel Islands background material (was: Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 28), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 24, Lang Gérard
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn

Feb 10 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #19: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Mark Davis
[Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #17: relationship guarantee, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #16: Romanian/Modolvan example, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #15: uz-Zxxx example, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #14: change "follow" to "consult", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #13: "two authorities", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #12: primary language SHOULD, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #11: use of word "response", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #10: truncation, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #8: "language priority list", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #7: change "if when", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #4: change "than", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #6: change "the ones", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #5: change "apply", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #3: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #2: move 2860 ref to informative, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, John Cowan
[Ltru] Issue #1: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 21/// E: Channel Islands and co, Lang Gérard
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst

Feb 09 2009

Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 2, Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move 2860 ref to informative, Martin Duerst

Feb 08 2009

Re: [Ltru] "different from" issue & other editorial decisions (was Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d ), CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Mark Davis
[Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: relationship guarantee, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: Romanian/Modolvan example, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: uz-Zxxx example, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: change "follow" to "consult", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: primary language SHOULD, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: "two authorities", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: use of word "response", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: truncation, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] issue: "language priority list", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] change "if when", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] change "than", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] change "the ones", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] change "apply", Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] "different from" issue, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] draft-21 mod: move 2860 ref to informative, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] draft-21 mod: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, John Cowan

Feb 07 2009

Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bisi-d, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Randy Presuhn

Feb 06 2009

Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Edith Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Edith Whitehead
[Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn

Feb 05 2009

Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell

Feb 03 2009

Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn

Feb 03 2009

Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 2, Lang Gérard
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., CE Whitehead

Feb 02 2009

[Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-09.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Debbie Garside
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Debbie Garside
Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 1, Lang Gérard
Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Martin Duerst

Jan 31 2009

Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Doug Ewell

Jan 30 2009

[Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
[Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell

Jan 28 2009

[Ltru] Fwd: IAB Response to an Appeal from J-F C. Morfin dd 29 September 2008, Martin Duerst

Jan 25 2009

[Ltru] Fwd: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your comments on revisedproposed legend text to work-around the Pre-5378 Problem, Martin Duerst

Jan 24 2009

Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, CE Whitehead

Jan 22 2009

Re: [Ltru] Moving ahead, Stephane Bortzmeyer

Jan 14 2009

Re: [Ltru] Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review andcomments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn

Jan 14 2009

[Ltru] Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review and comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn

Jan 09 2009

[Ltru] Fwd: RFC Errata Update for Working Group Chairs, Randy Presuhn

Dec 22 2008

[Ltru] Fw: 74th IETF - Working Groups/BOF Scheduling, Randy Presuhn

Dec 19 2008

[Ltru] Fw: RFC 5378 Contributor License Form, Randy Presuhn

Dec 19 2008

Re: [Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn

Dec 18 2008

[Ltru] Re: Request for clarification (Was: requiring full prefixes) (I made a minor correction to my previous post)‏, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Moving ahead, Martin Duerst

Dec 16 2008

Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC (Was: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC (Was: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC (Was: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [Ltru] draft 20: final nits before submission, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73Plenary, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73Plenary, Martin Duerst

Dec 15 2008

Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73Plenary, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73Plenary, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary, Doug Ewell

Dec 11 2008

Re: [Ltru] Request for clarification (Was: requiring full prefixes) (I made a minor correction to my previous post), Randy Presuhn

Dec 11 2008

Re: [Ltru] Request for clarification (Was: requiring full prefixes) (I made a minor correction to my previous post), CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-20.txt, Internet-Drafts
[Ltru] draft-20: submitted., Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] draft-20 online..., Phillips, Addison

Dec 10 2008

[Ltru] draft 20: final nits before submission, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Doug Ewell

Dec 09 2008

Re: [Ltru] Prefix field (was: Hand-off to AD), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Prefix field (was: Hand-off to AD), Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] updated editors copy (seeking consensus), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] minor nit on draft-20, Martin Duerst
[Ltru] updated editors copy (seeking consensus), Phillips, Addison

Dec 07 2008

Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Doug Ewell

Dec 06 2008

Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated...‏, Randy Presuhn

Dec 06 2008

Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated...‏, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: editor's copy of draft-20 updated...‏, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Mark Davis

Dec 05 2008

Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Kent Karlsson
[Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Phillips, Addison

Dec 04 2008

Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] RE: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏--Off-list, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments�??, Peter Constable

Dec 03 2008

Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call commentsâ??, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call commentsâ??, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call commentsâ??, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call commentsâ??, Mark Davis
[Ltru] FW: FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments�, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏--Off-list, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏--Off-list, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, CE Whitehead
[Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Draft-19 posted..., Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-18 ABNF flaw, Addison Phillips
[Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-19.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 CLDR example, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 propageted subtag churn, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏, Phillips, Addison

Dec 01 2008

[Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-08.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏, CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p

Nov 29 2008

Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell

Nov 29 2008

Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
[Ltru] Re: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏ (through 2.2.1; I have additional comments on section 2, and on section 4.6; that's it so far), CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Fw: RFC 4645bis: making 'pes' and 'prs' extlangs, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p

Nov 28 2008

Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p
Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Kent Karlsson

Nov 27 2008

Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p

Nov 23 2008

Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson

Nov 22 2008

Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Doug Ewell

Nov 21 2008

Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Mark Davis

Nov 17 2008

Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Doug Ewell

Nov 11 2008

[Ltru] Fw: Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all new Submissionsto IETF, Randy Presuhn

Nov 10 2008

Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18example in 2.2.7), Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18example in2.2.7), Martin Duerst

Nov 06 2008

Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7), Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in2.2.7), John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in2.2.7), Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7), Doug Ewell

Nov 05 2008

Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn

Nov 04 2008

Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.2 "at least one", Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Typo in name in draft 18, Shawn Steele
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Typo in name in draft 18, Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Typo in name in draft 18, Peter Constable

Nov 03 2008

Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.2 "at least one", Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 fragment in 3.4, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.2 mailing list address, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 Latg?, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 page 26 "either" lacks "or", Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.2 "at least one", Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.1, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Phillips, Addison

Nov 02 2008

Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, John Cowan
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 propageted subtag churn, Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Doug Ewell
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 propageted subtag churn, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 CLDR example, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 5.1 URL, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 fragment in 3.4, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.2 mailing list address, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 Latg?, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 page 26 "either" lacks "or", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.2 "at least one", Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.1, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] 4646bis-18 2.2.4 (4)(e) obfuscation, Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-07.txt, Internet-Drafts

Oct 31 2008

[Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-18.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [Ltru] draft-18 is submitted..., Doug Ewell
[Ltru] draft-18 is submitted..., Phillips, Addison

Oct 31 2008

Re: [Ltru] WG Last Calls completed, Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] WG Last Calls completed, Phillips, Addison

Mail converted by MHonArc