ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Oct 31 2008
• [Ltru] WG Last Calls completed, Martin Duerst
• Oct 27 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
• Oct 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt --Editorial Comments Only, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
• Oct 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, Broome, Karen
• Oct 19 2008
• [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, Felix Sasaki
• Oct 18 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt --Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
• Oct 17 2008
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Felix Sasaki
• Oct 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
• Oct 15 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
• Oct 14 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt‏, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt (editorial comment inverted noun phrase), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Martin Duerst
• Oct 12 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy: draft-4645bis-07, Felix Sasaki
• Oct 11 2008
• [Ltru] Editor's copy: draft-4645bis-07, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt (editorial comment inverted noun phrase), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
• Oct 10 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt (editorial comment inverted noun phrase), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt (editorial comment inverted noun phrase), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Comments on RFC4646bis, Martin Duerst
• Oct 09 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Comments on RFC4646bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Comments on RFC4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Comments on RFC4646bis, Richard Ishida
• Re: [Ltru] Scope of ISO 3166//// Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 26, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Scope of ISO 3166, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Scope of ISO 3166//// Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 26, Lang Gérard
• Oct 08 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 24, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 24, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Peter Constable
• Oct 07 2008
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] ISO 3166 private-use code elements, John Cowan
• [Ltru] [OT] ISO 3166 private-use code elements, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Debbie Garside
• Oct 06 2008
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Lang Gérard
• [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Prefixes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Prefixes, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Prefixes, Leif Halvard Silli
• Oct 04 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Prefixes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Prefixes, Leif Halvard Silli
• Oct 03 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] Last Call for draft-4645bis?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Prefixes (was: Re: Uniqueness of variant subtags), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Too fine-grained? (was: Re: Uniqueness of variant subtags), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Too fine-grained?, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Too fine-grained? (was: Re: Uniqueness of variant subtags), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
• Oct 02 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, mark
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Recent changes in ISO 639-3, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Doug Ewell
• Oct 01 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Doug Ewell
• Sep 30 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Martin Duerst
• Sep 29 2008
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Last Call comments for draft-4646bis-17, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06, Phillips, Addison
• Sep 28 2008
• [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
• Sep 24 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Sep 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Unicity of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Doug Ewell
• Sep 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Sep 20 2008
• [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Unicity of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Unicity of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Doug Ewell
• Sep 19 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Unicity of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Unicity of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Unicity of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Sep 17 2008
• Re: [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Sep 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Special characters (was: Re: Expanding the xx..yy ranges), Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Special characters (was: Re: Expanding the xx..yy ranges), Doug Ewell
• Sep 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Expanding the xx..yy ranges (was: Re: Two grandfatheredtagsfor 'Hakka'), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Expanding the xx..yy ranges (was: Re: Two grandfathered tagsfor 'Hakka'), Gerard Meijssen
• Sep 12 2008
• [Ltru] OT: ISO 639-6 RA, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Fw: 73rd IETF - WG Scheduling - CUTOFF SEPT. 15, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] FW: Nomcom call for candidates, Randy Presuhn
• Sep 07 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #2, Doug Ewell
• Sep 06 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Registry updated, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Registry updated, Peter Constable
• Sep 05 2008
• [Ltru] Fw: IETF Mailing List Issue, Randy Presuhn
• Sep 02 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #1, ISO639-3
• Aug 26 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 42, Issue 6, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Expanding the xx..yy ranges (was: Re: Two grandfathered tagsfor 'Hakka'), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Registry updated, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Registry updated, Doug Ewell
• Aug 26 2008
• [Ltru] inter-locale down..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Registry updated, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [private] Re: Registry updated, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] [private] Re: Registry updated, Lang Gérard
• [Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #2, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #1, Doug Ewell
• Aug 25 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #1, ISO639-3
• Re: [Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #1, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] [private] Re: Registry updated, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [private] Re: Registry updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] [private] Re: Registry updated, Doug Ewell
• Aug 18 2008
• [Ltru] Registry updated, Doug Ewell
• Aug 04 2008
• [Ltru] SOT - nomcom volunteers needed, Randy Presuhn
• Aug 01 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Using BCP 47 for translation information, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #2 [rup], ISO639-3
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #2, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #2, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #2, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Using BCP 47 for translation information, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Using BCP 47 for translation information, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #2, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1 [bwo] and [bxx], Doug Ewell
• Jul 31 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1 [bwo] and [bxx], ISO639-3
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1 [bwo] and [bxx], Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1 [bwo] and [bxx], John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1 [awb] and [vwa], ISO639-3
• Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1, Doug Ewell
• Jul 30 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Expanding the xx..yy ranges (was: Re: Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka'), Doug Ewell
• Jul 29 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Expanding the xx..yy ranges (was: Re: Two grandfathered tagsfor 'Hakka'), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Expanding the xx..yy ranges (was: Re: Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka'), Doug Ewell
• Jul 28 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Click letters (was: Re: Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka'), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Martin Duerst
• Jul 27 2008
• [Ltru] Click letters (was: Re: Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka'), Doug Ewell
• Jul 26 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Jul 25 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Jul 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Randy Presuhn
• Jul 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Jul 22 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] "Conditional GET" now broken on IANA HTTP server, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Jul 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Jul 18 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• Jul 17 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Jul 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] [michelle.cotton at icann.org: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML], Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• Jul 15 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• Jul 12 2008
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Jul 12 2008
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] suppress-script and extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] suppress-script and extlang, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] suppress-script and extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• Jul 11 2008
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] editor's copy..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1.2: sgn-US, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Brief absence, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] registry comments on deprecated 639-1 values, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Doug Ewell
• Jul 10 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Peter Constable
• [Ltru] registry comments on deprecated 639-1 values, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Jul 09 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.2: text in two scripts identical (?), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1: sgn-US, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.1.2: sgn-US, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] OT: Latn and fonipa, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-16.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Jul 08 2008
• [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.2: text in two scripts identical (?), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.1.1: sgn-US, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] draft-16 updated on inter-locale., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, Phillips, Addison