ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Jul 25 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Jul 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Randy Presuhn
• Jul 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Jul 22 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] "Conditional GET" now broken on IANA HTTP server, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Jul 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis, Doug Ewell
• Jul 18 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• Jul 17 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Jul 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] [michelle.cotton at icann.org: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML], Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• Jul 15 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• Jul 12 2008
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Jul 12 2008
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] suppress-script and extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] suppress-script and extlang, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] suppress-script and extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• Jul 11 2008
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] editor's copy..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1.2: sgn-US, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Brief absence, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] registry comments on deprecated 639-1 values, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Doug Ewell
• Jul 10 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Peter Constable
• [Ltru] registry comments on deprecated 639-1 values, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Jul 09 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.2: text in two scripts identical (?), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1: sgn-US, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.1.2: sgn-US, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Martin Hosken
• [Ltru] OT: Latn and fonipa, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-16.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Jul 08 2008
• [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.2: text in two scripts identical (?), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.1.1: sgn-US, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] draft-16 updated on inter-locale., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.6: Preferred-Value field for extlangs, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.1: definition of "primary language subtag", Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft-16 editor copy..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.6: Preferred-Value field for extlangs, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.1: definition of "primary language subtag", Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Possibly a way forward? (was extlang & deprecation (wasdraft updated...)), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Possibly a way forward? (was extlang & deprecation (was draft updated...)), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 3.1.6: Preferred-Value field for extlangs, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Possibly a way forward? (was extlang & deprecation (was draft updated...)), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Doug Ewell
• Jul 07 2008
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.6: requirements on extensions, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.2.8: typo, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 2.2.8: typo, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 2.2.6: requirements on extensions, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 2.2.3: position of script subtag, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] 2.2.1: definition of "primary language subtag", Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, John Cowan
• [Ltru] 2.2: wording, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Peter Constable
• Jul 03 2008
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
• Jul 03 2008
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
• Jul 02 2008
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
• Jul 01 2008
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
• Jun 28 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Remaining issues, Doug Ewell
• Jun 27 2008
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Bihari and Himachali (was: Re: Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06), Doug Ewell
• Jun 26 2008
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
• Jun 25 2008
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Peter Constable
• Jun 24 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Martin Duerst
• Jun 22 2008
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
• Jun 22 2008
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
• Jun 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Capitalization of "Sign Languages", John Cowan
• [Ltru] Capitalization of "Sign Languages", Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] "extlangish" (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
• Jun 20 2008
• Re: [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] "extlangish" (was: Re: draft updated), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] "extlangish" (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Doug Ewell
• Jun 19 2008
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] A thought from the IETF list, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
• [Ltru] A thought from the IETF list, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
• Jun 18 2008
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated (was: ABNF for grandfathered/irregular), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] draft updated (was: ABNF for grandfathered/irregular), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Doug Ewell
• Jun 17 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
• Jun 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Doug Ewell
• Jun 14 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] private-use scope and extlang..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] private-use scope and extlang..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 updated on inter-locale..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] private-use scope and extlang..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Doug Ewell
• Jun 13 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• [Ltru] draft-16 updated on inter-locale..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] private-use scope and extlang..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Doug Ewell
• Jun 12 2008
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Java regex for draft-16..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Java regex for draft-16..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Java regex for draft-16..., Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Java regex for draft-16..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), Doug Ewell
• Jun 11 2008
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Mark Davis