ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Jun 11 2008
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Can we live with Draft 15?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Can we live with Draft 15?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Doug Ewell
• Jun 10 2008
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Can we live with Draft 15?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] New content type for www.langtag.net, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] New content type for www.langtag.net, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Section 4.1.x Tagging Macrolanguages/Using themacrolanguage tag, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Section 4.1.x Tagging Macrolanguages/Using themacrolanguage tag, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-15.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Doug Ewell
• Jun 09 2008
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Section 4.1.x Tagging Macrolanguages/Using the macrolanguage tag, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] [rt.amsl.com #7749] Mailinglist issue, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] [rt.amsl.com #7749] Mailinglist issue, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] extlang registration rules... (was Section 2.2.2, etc.), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Doug Ewell
• Jun 08 2008
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, John Cowan
• [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Doug Ewell
• Jun 07 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Usage contexts, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Section 4.1.x Tagging Macrolanguages/Using the macrolanguage tag, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] Usage contexts, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 was RE: zh != Mandarin, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] Direct links to 369-3 in Section 4.1.1, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] updated draft-15..., Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] extlang registration rules... (was Section 2.2.2, etc.), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] [rt.amsl.com #7749] Mailinglist issue, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.2 exhaustive specification of possible prefixes, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] User interface, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 was RE: zh != Mandarin, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] updated draft-15..., Phillips, Addison
• Jun 06 2008
• Re: [Ltru] User interface, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] extlang registration rules... (was Section 2.2.2, etc.), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] extlang registration rules... (was Section 2.2.2, etc.), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] extlang registration rules... (was Section 2.2.2, etc.), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 was RE: zh != Mandarin, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 was RE: zh != Mandarin, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] User interface (was: Re: zh != Mandarin), Broome, Karen
• [Ltru] extlang registration rules... (was Section 2.2.2, etc.), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] [rt.amsl.com #7749] Mailinglist issue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Mailinglist issue, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] User interface (was: Re: zh != Mandarin), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.2 exhaustive specification of possible prefixes, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] User interface (was: Re: zh != Mandarin), Gerard Meijssen
• [Ltru] User interface (was: Re: zh != Mandarin), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] ISO 639 was RE: zh != Mandarin, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Information Dissemination, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.2 exhaustive specification ofpossible prefixes, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.2 exhaustive specification of possible prefixes, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.2 exhaustive specification of possible prefixes, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] section 4.1.1. on Tagging Encompassed Languages, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] Section 2.2.2 exhaustive specification of possible prefixes, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Jun 05 2008
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Standard german (Was: Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Standard german (Was: Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] draft-15 update..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Standard german (Was: Consensus call: extlang, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Standard german (Was: Consensus call: extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Standard german (Was: Consensus call: extlang, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Fw: Mailing List Filters, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Standard german (Was: Consensus call: extlang, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Doug Ewell
• Jun 04 2008
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] zh != Mandarin, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Bogus language tags in Wikipedia, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Bogus language tags in Wikipedia, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] early proto draft-15..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Doug Ewell
• Jun 03 2008
• Re: [Ltru] early proto draft-15..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] early proto draft-15..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] early proto draft-15..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] early proto draft-15..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] heads up: Estonian, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
• Re: [Ltru] Mailinglist issue, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] early proto draft-15..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Mailinglist issue, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Jun 02 2008
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., John Cowan
• [Ltru] early proto draft-15..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Mailinglist issue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Mailinglist issue, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Mailinglist issue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Line breaks, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] More on combination type/scope field, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] tags for Chinese, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Martin Hosken
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• [Ltru] tags for Chinese, Peter Constable
• Jun 01 2008
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Mailinglist issue (was: 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Minor change to 639-3 lists, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• May 31 2008
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Line breaks, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Off topic: Mutually intellegibile (was: Re: a modest proposal...), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Minor change to 639-3 lists, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Off topic: Mutually intellegibile (was: Re: a modest proposal...), John Cowan
• [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] [OT] Line breaks, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Off topic: Mutually intellegibile (was: Re: a modest proposal...), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Leif Halvard Silli
• May 30 2008
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] ar and other Macrolanguages (was: Re: Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example), Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] ar and other Macrolanguages (was: Re: Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Elephants and Goldfish Require Structure was RE: a modest proposal..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] HTML format table (from previous e-mail), Broome, Karen
• [Ltru] HTML format table (from previous e-mail), Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• [Ltru] Ich bin ein Berliner, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Elephants and Goldfish Require Structure was RE: a modest proposal..., Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Leif Halvard Silli
• May 29 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, tex
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Misha Wolf
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] a modest proposal..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, tex
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Doug Ewell
• May 28 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] [A little OT] Feedback and Communication was (Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language ), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Don Osborn
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] (no subject), tex
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Ethnologue and ISO 639-3, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• May 27 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Scandinavian (RE: extlang for users), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Don Osborn
• [Ltru] Lookup, matching, etc., Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Does 'de' really mean "only standard German"?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Don Osborn
• Re: [Ltru] Applications and Backward Compatibility RE: Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Second-guessing (was: Re: Consensus call: extlang), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Wondering about compromize (was: Re: Consensus call: extlang), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Applications and Backward Compatibility RE: Consensus call: extlang, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage usage, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage usage, Leif Halvard Silli
• May 26 2008
• [Ltru] [OT] Web archiving software is brittle (was: Re: Consensus call: extlang), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] extlang for users, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage usage, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang, Peter Constable