ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• May 07 2008
• Re: [Ltru] default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere, Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, pektiong
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, pektiong
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Arne Goetje
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, pektiong
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
• May 06 2008
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Concrete text fixes (Re: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Concrete text fixes (Re: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh", Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Pinyin in language tags (Was: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Peter Constable
• May 05 2008
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Concrete text fixes (Re: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Two questions on draft-4646bis-13, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Two questions on draft-4646bis-13, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
• Re: [Ltru] Concrete text fixes (Re: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Asmus Freytag
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Asmus Freytag
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Concrete text fixes (Re: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Shawn Steele
• [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags (Was: Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Elisabeth Porteneuve
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Two questions on draft-4646bis-13, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-05, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-05, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Leif Halvard Silli
• May 04 2008
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Ira McDonald
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Pinyin in language tags (Was: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Pinyin in language tags (Was: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Questions before submitting draft-4645bis-05, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Concrete text fixes (Re: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Concrete text fixes (Re: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION REQUEST - zxx, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Ira McDonald
• [Ltru] text proposition for extlang filtering by rfc 4647, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION REQUEST - zxx, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang Debate, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Language tag education and negotiation, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
• [Ltru] Extlang Debate, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION REQUEST - zxx, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] extlang was I'm really confused by chinese..., Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Ira McDonald
• May 03 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION REQUEST - zxx, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 4646bis (was my incorrectly named brain-cramp :), Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Edmon Chung
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
• May 02 2008
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
• [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
• [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
• May 01 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
• Apr 29 2008
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-13.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] draft-13 submitted..., Phillips, Addison
• Apr 29 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], ISO639-3
• Apr 28 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Phillips, Addison
• Apr 27 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Doug Ewell
• Apr 25 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Doug Ewell
• Apr 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Mutability of Preferred-Value?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Doug Ewell
• Apr 18 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] fix for TP, Mark Davis
• Apr 17 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Marion Gunn
• Apr 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: secdir review of draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Editorial fix, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Martin Duerst
• Apr 15 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] [julian.reschke at gmx.de: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)], Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 14 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
• Apr 13 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
• Apr 12 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
• Apr 11 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Martin Duerst
• Apr 10 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
• Apr 04 2008
• [Ltru] FYI: Unicode 5.1 Released, Mark Davis
• Mar 31 2008
• [Ltru] MD48: conflicts in requirements, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] OT: GUM3C 2008 WLDC Conference Call - Call for Papers and Workshops, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Addison Phillips
• Mar 30 2008
• Re: [Ltru] mailing list UTF-8 check, Doug Ewell
• Mar 27 2008
• [Ltru] mailing list UTF-8 check, Randy Presuhn
• Mar 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Peter Constable
• Mar 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
• Mar 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
• Mar 20 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Randy Presuhn
• Mar 19 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Randy Presuhn
• Mar 18 2008
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Elisabeth Porteneuve
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), John Cowan
• [Ltru] draft-13 (editor's copy) updated on inter-locale, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Forward from ietf-languages (nn, no, nb), Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Mark Davis
• Mar 17 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-12.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, LB
• Mar 16 2008
• [Ltru] [OT] Sorry for duplicate posting, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Editorial commenets on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
• Mar 14 2008
• [Ltru] draft-12 submitted..., Addison Phillips
• Mar 08 2008
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, Nicolas Krebs
• Mar 04 2008
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Addison Phillips
• Mar 03 2008
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Karen_Broome
• Feb 25 2008
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6--Off-list but already discussed, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] typo in "language subtag reviewer", Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
• Feb 24 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, John Cowan
• Feb 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments), CE Whitehead
• Feb 22 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments) WAS: Regist, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments) WAS: Regist, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, LB
• [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
• Feb 21 2008
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] editor's copy updated and posted to inter-locale, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
• Feb 20 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and4645bis, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Implementation report, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Implementation report, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Implementation report (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
• Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
• Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
• Feb 18 2008
• [Ltru] Fw: archives gone missing, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] ltru mailing list test, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] ltru mailing list test, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
• Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, LB
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 17 2008
• [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
• Feb 16 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
• Feb 15 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Doug Ewell
• Feb 14 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Extensions, Extended Language Subtags (new topic from Some typos . . .), Kent Karlsson