ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Feb 14 2008
• [Ltru] Extensions, Extended Language Subtags (new topic from Some typos . . .), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and4645bis, Martin Duerst
• Feb 13 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from4646bis/4645bis (long), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from4646bis/4645bis (long), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] figure 3 title, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] charter web page problem, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] preferred-value of zh-cmn in draft-4645bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] preferred-value of zh-cmn in draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] end of edits... link to diff, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] figure 3 title, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] draft-12 edits already in place..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Addison Phillips
• Feb 12 2008
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', John Cowan
• [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] preferred-value of zh-cmn in draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Message Subjects, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] charter web page problem, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Doug Ewell
• Feb 11 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from4646bis/4645bis(long), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Randy Presuhn
• Feb 10 2008
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), John Cowan
• [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Doug Ewell
• Feb 08 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 08 2008
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Feb 06 2008
• [Ltru] ltru mailing list test, Randy Presuhn
• Feb 02 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed wording for 639-3 items already retired, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Proposed wording for 639-3 items already retired, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Principles of Operation, Doug Ewell
• Feb 01 2008
• ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
• ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
• Jan 31 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, John Cowan
• Jan 30 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Excluding language subtag 'eur' (was: Re: Principles of Operation), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Excluding language subtag 'eur' (was: Re: Principles of Operation), Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] Excluding language subtag 'eur' (was: Re: Principles ofOperation), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Excluding language subtag 'eur' (was: Re: Principles of Operation), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Jukka K. Korpela
• [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Using the "eur" tag, John Cowan
• Jan 29 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Shelta, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Shelta, Marion Gunn
• Jan 28 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, Doug Ewell
• Jan 27 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Frank Ellermann
• Jan 26 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Doug Ewell
• Jan 25 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Frank Ellermann
• Jan 23 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
• Jan 22 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
• [Ltru] Re: Update of milestones, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Update of milestones, Martin Duerst
• Jan 20 2008
• RE: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Addison Phillips
• Jan 19 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: ABNF guidance, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Doug Ewell
• Jan 18 2008
• Fwd: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, LB
• [Ltru] Re: ABNF guidance, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Fw: Internet-Drafts Submission Cutoff Dates for the 71st IETF Meeting in Philadelphia, PA, USA, Randy Presuhn
• Jan 17 2008
• [Ltru] ABNF guidance, Addison Phillips
• Jan 16 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Update on draft-4645bis, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, John Cowan
• Jan 15 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Karen_Broome
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, John Cowan
• Jan 10 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Doug Ewell
• Jan 10 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, LB
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
• Jan 09 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, LB
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, Doug Ewell
• Jan 08 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, LB
• Re: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Nicholas Shanks
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, John Cowan
• Jan 07 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders—making subtags inclusive, Nicholas Shanks
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond bordersï??making subtags inclusive, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders?making subtags inclusive, Nicholas Shanks
• [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Nicholas Shanks
• [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders—making subtags inclusive, Nicholas Shanks
• Jan 04 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Randy Presuhn
• Jan 04 2008
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Jan 03 2008
• [Ltru] Re: Addition request: alsatian, Karen_Broome
• [Ltru] Happy International Year of Languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Dec 25 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Doug Ewell
• Dec 23 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Peter Constable
• Dec 22 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Frank Ellermann
• Dec 21 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, John Cowan
• Dec 18 2007
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU Milestones past due, Doug Ewell
• Dec 17 2007
• [Ltru] RE: MIB textual conventions for Uri and LangTag, Andy Kessler (kessler)
• [Ltru] Re: MIB textual conventions for Uri and LangTag, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] MIB textual conventions for Uri and LangTag, David McWalter
• Dec 16 2007
• [Ltru] Re: deletion of Extended Language Subtags in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: LTRU Milestones past due, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: MUSTard in the IANA section, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Fwd: LTRU Milestones past due, Martin Duerst
• Dec 15 2007
• [Ltru] Re: deletion of Extended Language Subtags in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] deletion of Extended Language Subtags in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] deletion of Extended Language Subtags in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10, Nicolas Krebs
• Re: [Ltru] MUSTard in the IANA section, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] MUSTard in the IANA section, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Doug Ewell
• Dec 14 2007
• RE: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan throws in the towel on extlangs, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Corrections to 4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Corrections to 4646bis-11 (was: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Corrections for 4646bis-11 (was: Review of 4646bis-10: registration authorities), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: posted draft-11, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan throws in the towel on extlangs, John Cowan
• [Ltru] posted draft-11, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-11.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan throws in the towel on extlangs, Karen_Broome
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] Re: John Cowan throws in the towel on extlangs, John Cowan
• Dec 13 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Dec 12 2007
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] RE: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Ira McDonald
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] RE: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] query: status of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10 submission, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10: submission, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: What is EU for in locales?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] RE: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10: submission, Martin Duerst
• Dec 11 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Swiss German and Alsatian, Nicolas Krebs
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Marion Gunn
• RE: [Ltru] What is EU for in locales?, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Vanity tags (was: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10: submission, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10: submission, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] What is EU for in locales?, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: draft-4645bis-03, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10: submission, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] What is EU for in locales?, John Cowan
• Dec 10 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Swiss German and Alsatian, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] draft-4645bis-03, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Frank Ellermann
• Dec 09 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Montenegrin what-if, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, John Cowan
• Montenegrin what-if (was RE: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: The blunder of the year, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: The blunder of the year, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Broken folding (was: (editor response) Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"), Peter Constable
• Dec 08 2007
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Swiss German and Alsatian, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Broken folding (was: (editor response) Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Kent Karlsson
• RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Swiss German and Alsatian, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Swiss German and Alsatian, Nicolas Krebs
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Broken folding (was: (editor response) Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", John Cowan
• [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)", Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10: registration authorities, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10: registration authorities, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Dec 07 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10: registration authorities, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] (editor response) Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Re: Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: The blunder of the year, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Dec 06 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Re: Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Latin / "un-deprecation" / generic variants / extensions(was: Frank's comments), Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Non-Latin-1 Description fields in RFC 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Frank's comments, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] The blunder of the year, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Frank's comments, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] RE: Remove extlang from ABNF? (Was: summary ofrecommendations coming out of this week's teleconf, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• Dec 05 2007
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Ira McDonald
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Shawn Steele
• [Ltru] Latin / "un-deprecation" / generic variants / extensions (was: Frank's comments), Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• RE: [Ltru] RFR - RFC4647, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Frank's comments, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Frank's comments, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] no teleconference this week, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] no teleconference this week, Martin Duerst
• RE: [Ltru] RFR - RFC4647, Shawn Steele
• RE: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10: submission, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] no teleconference this week, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] draft-10 on its way with more modifications..., Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Fw: Frank's comments, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] no teleconference this week, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] no teleconference this week, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: proto-draft-10, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Ira McDonald
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] Re: proto-draft-10, Doug Ewell