ltru Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Jan 20 2010
• Re: [Ltru] [Fwd: Re: [TC46-L] [OLD-IRISH-L] An official language code for Primitive Irish], Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] [Fwd: Re: [TC46-L] [OLD-IRISH-L] An official language code for Primitive Irish], Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] [Fwd: Re: [TC46-L] [OLD-IRISH-L] An official language code for Primitive Irish], Marion Gunn
• Jan 19 2010
• [Ltru] [Fwd: Re: [TC46-L] [OLD-IRISH-L] An official language code for Primitive Irish], Marion Gunn
• Jan 17 2010
• [Ltru] URIs for language tags, Felix Sasaki
• Jan 14 2010
• [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-davis-u-langtag-ext-00.txt, Randy Presuhn
• Jan 13 2010
• [Ltru] Fw: Boilerplate changes Required for TLP 4.0, Randy Presuhn
• Dec 27 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Doug Ewell
• Dec 16 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Randy Presuhn
• Dec 15 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, John Cowan
• Dec 13 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt, Randy Presuhn
• Dec 02 2009
• Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru), Peter Constable
• Nov 30 2009
• Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru), IESG Secretary
• Nov 25 2009
• [Ltru] Appointment of Language Subtag expert reviewers and WG closure, Alexey Melnikov
• Nov 10 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Nov 08 2009
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, Doug Ewell
• Nov 07 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Nov 03 2009
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, Andrew Cunningham
• Nov 02 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Oct 30 2009
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, John Cowan
• Oct 30 2009
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, Andrew Cunningham
• Re: [Ltru] Pinyin language?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Pinyin language?, Mark Davis ☕
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, Mark Davis ☕
• Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Oct 19 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: [rt.amsl.com #20489] ltru WG milestone completion, Randy Presuhn
• Sep 09 2009
• Re: [Ltru] WG chairs affiliation, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Sep 09 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: IESG Statement on Copyright, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] nomcom, Randy Presuhn
• Sep 07 2009
• Re: [Ltru] BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Sep 05 2009
• Re: [Ltru] BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages, Mark Davis ⌛
• Sep 04 2009
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 5645 on Update to the Language Subtag Registry, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages, John Cowan
• [Ltru] BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages, rfc-editor
• [Ltru] RFC 5645 on Update to the Language Subtag Registry, rfc-editor
• Sep 03 2009
• Re: [Ltru] WG chairs affiliation, Randy Presuhn
• Aug 31 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: 76th IETF - Working Group/BOF Scheduling, Randy Presuhn
• Aug 25 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: 76th IETF - WG/BOF Scheduling, Randy Presuhn
• Aug 25 2009
• Re: [Ltru] New 4646bis IANA registry published, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Aug 22 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Aug 21 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis, Richard Ishida
• Aug 19 2009
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Nomination of Michael Everson as Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Nomination of Doug Ewell as Co-designated Expert, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, Harald Alvestrand
• Aug 18 2009
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282 revision, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] RFC 3282 revision, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Nomination of Dough Ewell as Co-designated Expert, Michael Everson
• Re: [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] Nomination of Michael Everson as Language Subtag Reviewer, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Nomination of Michael Everson as Language Subtag Reviewer, John Cowan
• Aug 17 2009
• [Ltru] [Fwd: Last Call for Language Tag experts as per draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23], Alexey Melnikov
• Aug 13 2009
• [Ltru] IANA Language Subtag Registry Lookup tool updated, Richard Ishida
• Aug 12 2009
• [Ltru] Status of SF new clause inside ISO 3166-1///RE: Ltru Digest, Vol 54, Issue 2, Lang Gérard
• Aug 10 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Adding variant subtag 'erzgeb' for Erzgebirgisch (was: Requests that have been on hold), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Adding variant subtag 'erzgeb' for Erzgebirgisch (was: Requests that have been on hold), CE Whitehead
• Aug 06 2009
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?, Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Any information on SF?, Mark Davis ⌛
• [Ltru] ISO FDIS 639-6, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, Doug Ewell
• Aug 04 2009
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, Randy Presuhn
• Jul 30 2009
• Re: [Ltru] New 4646bis IANA registry published, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] New 4646bis IANA registry published, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] New 4646bis IANA registry published, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] New 4646bis IANA registry published, "Martin J. Dürst"
• [Ltru] New 4646bis IANA registry published, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Jul 27 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Jul 26 2009
• [Ltru] Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, CE Whitehead
• Jul 24 2009
• [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?, Phillips, Addison
• Jul 20 2009
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomaly inupcomingregistry), Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry), Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis, Felix Sasaki
• Jul 19 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry), Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• [Ltru] Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 filtering?"), Julian Reschke
• [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis, Felix Sasaki
• Jul 18 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• Jul 17 2009
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Peter Constable
• Jul 16 2009
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry), John Cowan
• Jul 15 2009
• [Ltru] Rechartering (in general), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (wasFW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Gerard Meijssen
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry), Doug Ewell
• Jul 14 2009
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering (to handle 639-6 or otherwise), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry), Doug Ewell
• Jul 13 2009
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry), Phillips, Addison
• Jul 07 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: 75th IETF - Final Agenda, Randy Presuhn
• Jul 03 2009
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Doug Ewell
• Jul 01 2009
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Jun 28 2009
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] updated demo, Felix Sasaki
• Jun 27 2009
• [Ltru] updated demo, Mark Davis ⌛
• Jun 26 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" andgeography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Protocol Action: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Broome, Karen
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Protocol Action: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Protocol Action: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Protocol Action: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Jun 25 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Protocol Action: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" andgeography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" andgeography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63, Lang Gérard
• [Ltru] Protocol Action: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, The IESG
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Phillips, Addison
• Jun 24 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] National origins of participants, Broome, Karen
• [Ltru] National origins of participants, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Fw: Document Action: 'Update to the Language Subtag Registry' to Informational RFC, Doug Ewell
• Jun 23 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646, Alexey Melnikov
• Jun 22 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: Document Action: 'Update to the Language Subtag Registry' to Informational RFC, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: Document Action: 'Update to the Language Subtag Registry' to Informational RFC, Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Fwd: Document Action: 'Update to the Language Subtag Registry' to Informational RFC, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Fwd: Document Action: 'Update to the Language Subtag Registry' to Informational RFC, Mark Davis ⌛
• [Ltru] Document Action: 'Update to the Language Subtag Registry' to Informational RFC, The IESG
• Jun 21 2009
• [Ltru] Fw: Section Ordering in RFCs (Abstract Placement), Randy Presuhn
• Jun 19 2009
• [Ltru] Status of 4645bis and 4646bis, Alexey Melnikov
• Jun 18 2009
• Re: [Ltru] FW: Lisa's comments on 4646bis, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] FW: Lisa's comments on 4646bis, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] [Fwd: Lisa's comments on 4646bis], Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Alexey Melnikov
• Jun 17 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Jun 16 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Jun 13 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Mark Davis ⌛
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Peter Constable
• Jun 12 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), "Martin J. Dürst"
• [Ltru] Fw: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23.txt, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata (Apps #13), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata (Apps #13), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] [OT] Apology, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 43, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Randy Presuhn
• Jun 11 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft-23 editor's copy updated, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), "Martin J. Dürst"
• [Ltru] [OT] Re: Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata (Apps #13), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Jun 10 2009
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11) (was RE: par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" ), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Ticket #53 resolution?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Issue #63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Debbie Garside
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Marion Gunn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62, AD issue #14 (Very remote risk of DoS), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Ticket #53 resolution?, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:, Alexey Melnikov
• [Ltru] Issue 63:, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62, AD issue #14 (Very remote risk of DoS), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62, AD issue #14 (Very remote risk of DoS), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primary subtag case (Apps #12-b), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Code/code element/codet, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primary subtag case (Apps #12-b), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Jun 09 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Code/code element/codet, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #57: Code / Subtag distinction (Apps #10), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primary subtag case (Apps #12-b), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Code/code element/codet, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Schedule for this week, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #57: Code / Subtag distinction (Apps #10), "Martin J. Dürst"
• [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #57: Code / Subtag distinction (Apps #10), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST languagein 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primarysubtag case (Apps #12-b), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST languagein 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), "Martin J. Dürst"
• [Ltru] Code/code element/codetRE: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 7, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #57: Code / Subtag distinction (Apps #10), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #40: AD #7 - section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs UN M.49, "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primarysubtag case (Apps #12-b), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST languagein 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primary subtag case (Apps #12-b), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] On "code" in ISO standards, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST languagein 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11), Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primarysubtag case (Apps #12-b), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #57: Code / Subtag distinction (Apps #10), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type", Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata (Apps #13), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primary subtag case (Apps #12-b), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtag type (Apps #11), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] On "code" in ISO standards, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtag type (Apps #11), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Issue #57: Code / Subtag distinction (Apps #10), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Registering a primary language subtag (was: Additional issues with 4646bis...), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8), Randy Presuhn
• Jun 08 2009
• Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Registering a primary language subtag (was: Additional issues with 4646bis...), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Registering a primary language subtag (was: Additional issues with 4646bis...), Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #40: AD #7 - section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs UN M.49, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] On "code" in ISO standards, Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] On "code" in ISO standards, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] On "code" in ISO standards, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] On "code" in ISO standards, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] On "code" in ISO standards, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Peter Constable
• Jun 07 2009
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type", Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Registering a primary language subtag (was: Additional issues with 4646bis...), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #40: AD #7 - section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs UN M.49, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value, Alexey Melnikov