[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format



No, I'm pretty sure I don't want to say %x10 :-). I just typed ahead rather quickly to get the framework into place and haven't looked at it closely yet.

Your tips are very much appreciated.

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Frank Ellermann
> Sent: mardi 5 avril 2005 12:52
> To: ltru at ietf.org
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format
> 
> Addison Phillips wrote:
> 
> > Whups.
> 
> <g>  Are you sure that you want to mention \n %x10, and if you
> are sure, how about %x0A or %d10 ?  I really thought that it's
> more or less 2822 compatible, and then you'd have CrLf, not Lf.
> 
> How about: ...separated by a line "%%" ?
> Or if you want ABNF:  ...seaparated by a line "%%" CRLF.
> 
> Just copy what you need from RfC 2234bis (LF, CRLF, and LWSP
> line folding instead of the ugly "\" line continuations).
> 
> Google says that "record-jar" is based on RfC 822, and then
> it's CRLF and folding, not LF and "\".  Thanks for the sneak
> preview... ;-)
>                        Bye, Frank
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.