At 07:41 21/03/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote:
Hi - (co-chair hat off) > From: "John Cowan" <jcowan at reutershealth.com> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com> > Cc: <ltru at ietf.org> > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 8:41 PM > Subject: Re: [Ltru] [semi-OT] ISO 639-3, record-jars, and Boontling ... > From what I understand of the IETF process, this WG could go dormant > until ISO 639-3 was released, and then wake up for a relatively brief > period to incorporate the necessary few paragraphs in RFC 3066bis to > create RFC 3066ter. ... I think it would be really nice if we could put in text now that would not need revision later.
I fully agree with that. In particular ISO 639-4, which should permits to make the BCP 047 consistent with ISO 639-3, ISO 639-6 and the IANA entries - and obviously ISO 3166-2.
jfc _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.