[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward



Mark,

A small addition: I understand that the old orthography of Moldavian used/uses the Cyrillic sript (and the new one uses Latin).

Regards,
Erkki I. Kolehmainen
Coordinator, Cultural Diversity Issues in ICT
Research Institute for the Languages of Finland

Mark Davis wrote:

BTW, just for background information, I generated a more readable form of
the CLDR language info (draft for the next release), at
http://unicode.org/cldr/data/dropbox/language_info.txt

‎Mark

----- Original Message ----- From: "Addison Phillips" <addison.phillips at quest.com>
To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; <ltru at ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 15:31
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward


The problem is that the IANA considerations section contained a lot of
materials that really were not of interest to IANA. It contained:

    3.1  Format of the IANA Language Subtag Registry
    3.2  Maintenance of the Registry
    3.3  Stability of IANA Registry Entries
    3.4  Registration Procedure for Subtags
    3.5  Extensions and Extensions Namespace
    3.6  Conversion of the RFC 3066 Language Tag Registry

The new section can contain instructions to IANA explicitly. It doesn't
currently because we are in-flight and I haven't identified and moved (or
written) the text at present. I've posted a bit more of that work, just so
that it isn't unclear.

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


-----Original Message-----
From: ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
Sent: jeudi 14 avril 2005 12:57
To: ltru at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward

Hi -


From: "Addison Phillips" <addison.phillips at quest.com>
To: "John Cowan" <jcowan at reutershealth.com>; "Mark Davis"

<mark.davis at jtcsv.com>
Cc: <ltru at ietf.org>

Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 12:07 PM
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward


Below is a proposed version of the section "Choice of Language Tag".
In writing this text, I began a heavy reorganization of the document's

sections.

Too many forward references were being created,
so I have followed our previous discussion and:

1. Made the IANA Considerations section a very small separate section.
2. Made what was titled "IANA Considerations" into "Registry Format and

Maintenance"

I can tell you now that this would probably run into trouble.  The "IANA
Considerations"
section must have all the information, or at least fairly precise

pointers,

to everything
IANA would need to know.   Minimizing forward references is a good thing,
and the IANA
considerations section may be located anywhere within the body of the

memo.

(See
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-08.txt
section 4.)

Randy




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru





_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.