Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Addison Phillips" <addison.phillips at quest.com>
> To: "Addison Phillips" <addison.phillips at quest.com>; "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 12:26 PM
> Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward
...
> Instead, we should create fields that exactly match what you do with them.

Sounds like a good principle.

...
> Subtag: got
> Suppress_Script: Latn, Goth
> Comment: only an example

If the desired behaviour is for transcribed Gothic to be "got" and
for Gothic in its historic alphabet to be "got-Goth", then I
think this should have been:

+ Subtag: got
+ Supress_Script: Latn
+ Require_Script: Goth

(It's been nearly a quarter century since I worked with Gothic, so
I'm *not* making any claims that this would indeed be the desired
behaviour now, though it would have been correct then.)

Randy




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru