[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed Text for Moving Forward



> From: ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org]
On
> Behalf Of Mark Davis


> This is a real improvement. But in terms of results, it appears that
there
> is no real difference in guidance in having the Suppress_Script field,
and
> having nothing. So it is unclear why the 'Suppress_Script' is needed.

This is the most useful field: it is the one that addresses the concern
voiced by Ira and others: that we don't get users or application
developers going off and thinking that now they should use (say)
en-Latn-GB or that the inclusion of Latn in this case has no particular
concerns associated with it.



Peter Constable


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.