John Cowan wrote: > Beser a tsebrokhene Yidish vi nisht kayn Yidish. Okay, I understand it... meschugge ;-) For Randy's problem L-S2-V2 we could (ab)use L-S2 as a prefix of V2, and S1 as an "suppress_script" for L. I don't see a solution allowing to suppress S2 for L only in conjunction with V2. Unless we'd allow a "suppress_script" in the variant entry to overrule the normal "suppress_script". But is this needed anywhere ? The "suppress" kludge is for compatibility with existing 3066 content and implementations, not for hypothetical L-V2 cases. > the Ethnologue jesuitically defines away the problem by > viewing the minority variant as a separate language, which > sociolinguistically it generally is. Apparently a good idea. Bye, Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.