[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Cc:
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:40:32 -0700
References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050508032918.039af710 at mail.jefsey.com><6.0.0.20.2.20050508154021.06275280 at itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp><01LO1QSCZ7S800004T at mauve.mrochek.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050509181241.048ab7f0 at mail.jefsey.com>

Hi -

> From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey at jefsey.com>
> To: <ned.freed at mrochek.com>; "Martin Duerst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
> Cc: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
...
> This is because scripts do not belong to RFC 3066 but to RFC 2277.
...

Our charter clearly directs us to address the question of script identification
in our update to 3066.

Randy




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

References:
- [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
  - From: Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
  - From: ned . freed
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.