[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] [psg.com #957] compatibility of description format with ISO table format

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Cc:
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 15:06:29 -0700

Hi -

> Comment 29 in message
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg00540.html
> reads
> "29. 3.1: Description of "description" is clueless. It is a description
> but
> does not intend to be an English description but it is one. The
> addition
> made in the IANA file are intended to be additions to  corresponding
> documented ISO tables. They MUST comply with the format of these tables
> otherwise they add a disparity between the table and their
> IANA "appendix"."


Randy, ltru co-chair




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #957] compatibility of description format with ISO table format
  - From: Frank Ellermann

Prev by Date: [Ltru] [psg.com #956] document use of "" as deprecation indicator
Next by Date: [Ltru] [psg.com #958] move tag formation rules
Previous by thread: [Ltru] [psg.com #956] document use of "" as deprecation indicator
Next by thread: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #957] compatibility of description format with ISO table format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.