[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: ltru at ietf.org
Cc:
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:46:40 +0200
References: <20050510220454.BOGK11382.mta7.adelphia.net at megatron.ietf.org> <009301c555ed$9957b7c0$030aa8c0 at DEWELL>

Doug Ewell wrote:

> the accusations of treachery and skulduggery are completely
> uncalled for.

What are you talking about ?  You haven't quoted any context,
and I don't find the Message-ID in the References:

<20050510220454.BOGK11382.mta7.adelphia.net at megatron.ietf.org>

Outlook isn't suited for Internet usage, but this References
issue must be something else, a broken gateway somewhere (?)

                        Puzzled, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?
  - From: John Cowan

References:
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?
  - From: Doug Ewell

Prev by Date: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #946] use of both length and position toidentify subtag problematic
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] BCP forever (was: [psg.com #957])
Previous by thread: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.