[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?



At 14:35 11/05/2005, John Cowan wrote:
Frank Ellermann scripsit:
> Doug Ewell wrote:
>
> > the accusations of treachery and skulduggery are completely
> > uncalled for.
>
> What are you talking about ?  You haven't quoted any context,
> and I don't find the Message-ID in the References:

See http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg01571.html ,
which quotes the relevant bit of
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg00540.html .

This does not document "treachery and skulduggery". I see that you use your professional mailname and have no footer indicating this is a private position. If this is an official company position this is an interesting piece of news. As you know I favor IETF Members exposure and recognition through a better press coverage, because I sincerely hope it would prevent that kind of wording. But if this is a dominant company political attitude, it conforts some prior assesments that some have sided motivations. We are to live with it. But we do not forget it.
jfc


--
John Cowan       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        <jcowan at reutershealth.com>
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.