[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction allude tointendedbcp status?

From: "Scott Hollenbeck" <sah at 428cobrajet.net>
To: "'Addison Phillips'" <addison.phillips at quest.com>, "'Randy Presuhn'" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>, "'LTRU Working Group'" <ltru at ietf.org>
Cc:
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:53:53 -0400
In-reply-to: <634978A7DF025A40BFEF33EB191E13BC0B5A6C4E at irvmbxw01.quest.com>

> There is no way that I know of to insert this value except by 
> editing the generated document by hand.

Actually, I believe it *is* doable with xml2rfc.  I don't have access to my
references to confirm my suspicion, but I can check in the morning.

-Scott-


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

References:
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction allude to intendedbcp status?
  - From: Addison Phillips

Prev by Date: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction allude to intended bcp status?
Previous by thread: RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction allude to intendedbcp status?
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction allude to intended bcp status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.