Hi - > From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com> > To: <ltru at ietf.org> > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:02 PM > Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #957] compatibility of description formatwithISO table format ... The original comment reads: | 29. 3.1: Description of "description" is clueless. It is a description | but does not intend to be an English description but it is one. | The addition made in the IANA file are intended to be additions | to corresponding documented ISO tables. They MUST comply with the format | of these tables otherwise they add a disparity between the table and | their IANA "appendix". As a technical contributor: I believe the comment represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the registry and its fields. Just as the use of a foreign key in a relational database table does not constrain the type or content of that table's columns, we are not making additions to the ISO tables, and are not constrained by their format. As WG co-chair: I've seen no support for this proposal, and there are arguments against it, so I plan to mark it "rejected". Randy, ltru co-chair _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.