[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #960] use ITU E.164 calling codes instead of ISO 3166 country codes

From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey at jefsey.com>
To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>, "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Cc:
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:00:01 +0200
In-reply-to: <001201c55657$48ffe300$7f1afea9 at oemcomputer>
References: <001201c55657$48ffe300$7f1afea9 at oemcomputer>


At 20:28 11/05/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote:

Hi -
> In message
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg01643.html
> it was proposed to use ITU E.164 calling codes instead of ISO 3166
> country codes.

I haven't seen much support for this proposal, and some rather compelling
arguments against it, so unless I see a groundswell of support, I plan to
mark this one "rejected".


Where did you read _instead_??
jfc


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #960] use ITU E.164 calling codes instead of ISO 3166 country codes
  - From: Randy Presuhn

References:
- [Ltru] [psg.com #960] use ITU E.164 calling codes instead of ISO 3166 country codes
  - From: Randy Presuhn

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Interim and Paris?
Previous by thread: [Ltru] [psg.com #960] use ITU E.164 calling codes instead of ISO 3166 country codes
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #960] use ITU E.164 calling codes instead of ISO 3166 country codes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.