Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #958] move tag formation rules

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "John Cowan" <jcowan at reutershealth.com>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #958] move tag formation rules
>

> Randy Presuhn scripsit:
> > Hi -
> >
> > > Comment number 30 in
> > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg00540.html
> > > (referring to the -00- draft)
> > > "30. 3.1. includes a registry format description (OK) but also
> > > considerations on the way the tags should be formed which have nothing
> > > to
> > > do in a file description. They should be moved into 2.4.1"
>
> This should be marked accepted and closed, as the latest draft has taken it
> into account.
> > Randy, ltru co-chair
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ltru mailing list
> > Ltru at lists.ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
> >
>
> -- 
> John Cowan      jcowan at reutershealth.com        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>         Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?

Ok, I've marked this one "resolved".

Randy, ltru co-chair




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru