Hi - In entering comments from the message http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg00540.html there were a few where I haven't been able to figure out what is being requested. If anyone can come up with a constructive interpretation for any of these, I'd appreciate it. As they appear in the original posting, they are: > 5. Introduction: the introduction describes the use of the tag to name a > menu of references (dictionaries) and documents that it is often necessary > to document style related elements (dialect, orthography) and writing > system. These are the 5 elements I want to see documented. > 6. Introduction: documents that knowing the language is useful (qualifies) > or required (defines) for some processes. What is the intended meaning? > 7. Introduction: indicates that labels are one of the means of indicating > (meaning?) languages used. No other means is alluded to, and no comments > about their common consistency is provided? > 8. Introduction: identifies only two functions for the document: an > "identifier mechanism" and a "registration function". It does not talk of > the dissemination of that information, nor of the way applications should > use it. > 33. 3.3 : Understanding the meaning of "Subtags required for stability and > to keep the registry synchronised" will probably be a source of long > debates. It should be documented. > 55. it lists challenges to be addressed: "to specify a mechanism for easily > identifying the role of each subtag in the language tag". This is > addressed by the Draft. But this challenge is contradictory with stability > challenge above. If a language tag displays an identifiable subtag, it > becomes by nature dependent from the underlying value of the subtag. If someone can translate any of these into specific proposals for changes to the i-d, I'll happily create new RT tickets for them. If not, then at least it's documented that we tried to figure out what was being requested. Randy, ltru co-chair _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.