[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] [psg.com #962] use CAN instead of MAY in section 3.3 of -00

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Cc:
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 23:34:08 -0700

Hi -

> Comment 34 of
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg00540.html
> "34. 3.3. why a "MAY" concerning the "description, note and prefix
> fields" is not documented by conditions? Is that not a "CAN"."
>
> Subsequent discussion showed no support, and counter-argued that
> RFC 2119 doesn't provide "CAN", and that "MAY" is correct semantic.
>
> Issue rejected.

Randy, ltru co-chair




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Prev by Date: [Ltru] [psg.com #961] re-work part 3 of -00 draft
Next by Date: [Ltru] [psg.com #963] section on registration procedure is confusing
Previous by thread: [Ltru] [psg.com #961] re-work part 3 of -00 draft
Next by thread: [Ltru] [psg.com #963] section on registration procedure is confusing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.