Hi - > Comment 35 in > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg00540.html > reads: > "35. 3.3. the registration procedure is of extreme confusion and mixes > the form to use, the lack of definition of the requester, the iana.org > list which is not introduced, the registration request which must be > guessed, a non commented MAY, registration tricks, comments on probable > behaviour of the reviewing list, digression on Slovenian, designation > of the reviewer by the IESG, what should happen when the review period > has elapsed without any guidance to the reviewer, that a IANA list > Members and an IESG designated reviewer make an IETF decision, that the > initial registrant has some moral pre-eminence (under the form of a > comment) and that languages are not considered for registration on the > fact they actually exist, but on their own (non documented) merits." Has this been accommodated by the changes present in the -01 draft? Randy, ltru co-chair _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.