[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #970] add reference to xml schema version 1.0

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: ltru at ietf.org
Cc:
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:25:54 +0200
References: <014a01c556be$275e65c0$7f1afea9 at oemcomputer>

Randy Presuhn wrote:

>> "42. 6. compatibility is preserved with RFC 3066 but not
>> with evolution of ISO code elements. The XML Schema version
>> 1.0 requirements are quoted but not documented."

That appears to be related to the "forever canonical" debate,

Informative reference [19] is a pointer to the Schema spec.,
which has a pointer to RfC 3066.  W3C URLs are famous to be
stable => no problem, mark as closed or non-issue.  Bye, Frank

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

References:
- [Ltru] [psg.com #970] add reference to xml schema version 1.0
  - From: Randy Presuhn

Prev by Date: [Ltru] Re: Can someone map these comments into proposals?
Next by Date: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #969]character set considerations material is contradictory
Previous by thread: [Ltru] [psg.com #970] add reference to xml schema version 1.0
Next by thread: RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issues in securityconsiderations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.