[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #967] address homograph issues insecurityconsiderations

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: ltru at ietf.org
Cc:
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 22:01:56 +0200
References: <1987416CA83AC7499AC772F92E2DBF7803C08597 at LONSMSXM02.emea.ime.reuters.com>

Misha Wolf wrote:

>> LATIN SMALL LETTER L and DIGIT ONE.
> What about the digit "0" and the letter "O" ?

Only possible in variants.  In theory we could avoid even this
possiility, but then we'd lose e.g. scouse21 for 21st century
scouse.  If later somebody tries to register sc0use2L to cause
havoc the tag reviewer would reject it => no issue.  Bye, Frank

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

References:
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issues insecurityconsiderations
  - From: Misha Wolf

Prev by Date: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #969]character set considerations material is contradictory
Next by Date: [Ltru] ltru issues 972-981
Previous by thread: RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issues insecurityconsiderations
Next by thread: RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issues insecurityconsiderations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.