Randy Presuhn wrote:
> For matching to work, this would mean that an implementation
> "MUST" treat as equivalent *all* the aliases (as of the
> implementation date) for its supported set of (sub)tags.
I regret that my current workload does not allow me to analyse
the text of the ID to get at the precise meaning. So please
help me: Does this imply that all implementations must support
the ISO 639-2 codes even where there exists a long-established
ISO 639-1 code? I very much hope that the answer is No.
Thanks,
Misha
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
To find out more about Reuters Products and Services visit http://www.reuters.com/productinfo
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.