Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote: > As a technical contributor: > > From what I've been able to glean from secondary sources (I'm to cheap > to purchase this rather expensive multi-part specification) I don't > see how ISO 11179 is really applicable to our work, and I've seen no > statement of how applying it would increase our work's utility. > Consequently, I suggest we reject this item. I did read, or rather skim through, the on-line version to which a kind soul directed me. While it seems quite appropriate for a more ambitious type of registry than ours, one with multiple interrelated tables, I feel it would be overkill for our effort. Therefore, I give Randy's suggestion a big +1. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.