I agree with Frank. We should just follow the policy that we set down. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> To: <ltru at ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 07:18 Subject: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1026] what to do about Guernsey and Jersey > John.Cowan wrote: > > > 830 actually is a macrogeographical region, though it's a > > *small* macrogeographical region. > > It's not listed in the part with the macro-regions on their > page, it's still where it always was. > > > Jersey and Guernsey actually don't share anything at all > > except their Duke and their TV station. > > If that's also true for their languages we don't need 830 ;-> > > Let's just stick to the plan, whatever is true at "date B", > in Doug's "48 hours", gets a number. If they moved 830 to > "obsolete" don't list it, if they moved it to "macro-region" > keep it, and if their Web site is still unclear toss a coin. > > > Sark and Alderney, like Herm, Jethou, Brecqhou, and Lihou, > > are part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, so part of 831. > > Very vaguely I recall something special about Sark, asking > Google, <http://www.sark.gov.gg/static/> It was the "feudal" > Constitution, fascinating pages. For those more interested > in languages than in regions, they mention 'Sercquiaise' on > the history page. > Bye, Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru > > _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.