Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote: > No, I will only wait until we get a rough consensus. > Engineering means making tradeoffs. Perfection may > be possible, but it's usually too expensive (in time, money > or other resources) so I'll be happy once the WG gets its > act together and gets rough agreement on something. > If you guys can't come to a workable compromise quickly, > the co-chairs could conceivably declare victory with whatever > is in the draft. I am fine with either of these two choices: (a) include 831, 832, and 833 (all three) (b) exclude 831, 832, and 833 (all three) The only thing I am not fine with is treating 833 differently from 831 and 832 in some way. These three regions have a combined population of less than 240,000, and I have not seen any evidence that the use of any language in these places differs markedly from the use of the same language anywhere else. I don't think the draft should be held up due to disagreement on how to code these regions. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.