Re: [Ltru] Re: #1026

["Mark Davis" <mark.davis at jtcsv.com>]

I don't care about having in 200.

‎Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: <ltru at ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 20:50
Subject: [Ltru] Re: #1026


> Randy Presuhn wrote:
>
> > Forgive me for being dense, but neither of those two messages
> > says how it would address issue #900, the question of subtag
> > 200.
>
> The #900 stuff is old.  See subject, I was talking about #1026.
>
> For #900 you know that Doug and I want the 200 to be removed.
> I'm not sure what John, Mark, and you wanted to do about 200.
>
> > I have great sympathy for anyone trying to make sense of
> > these stream-of-consciousness postings, and am baffled by
> > your moving it into the thread for issue #1026, unless
> > you're going to argue that there should be a common
> > underlying principle.
>
> |>>> Are you arguing FOR or AGAINST removing region subtag 200?
>
> |>> Let Doug remove it.  But I'm worried about the TL -> XX
> |>> bug, we discussed this for weeks, why is it still incorrect
> |>> in -04 ?
>
> |> Could you point me to the specific text that was proposed?
> |> The best way to ensure that an i-d addresses your concerns
> |> is to propose specific text.
>
> I only answered your question, and because I knew that your
> question and my answer don't belong to #900 I even changed the
> subject: #1026 (was: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200)
>
> Now I change it again stripping the old (was: ...) part.  Bye.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
>



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru