Randy, the matching document has never had the same deadline as the registry one; we need to concentrate on getting the registry done, and not get distracted. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> To: <ltru at ietf.org> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 17:47 Subject: [Ltru] Re: draft-ietf-ltru-matching-02 > Mark Davis wrote: > > > The matching document has had not nearly the same review, > > nor has the same timetable in the charter. > > Randy mentioned it when we talked about the Paris timetable. > > It needs some clean-up before it can survive Bruce's famous > reviews. For the ABNF I just found a third potential issue: > > lang = ( 2*8ALPHA *[ "-" extlang ] ) / "*" > extlang = 3ALPHA / "*" > > lng-exa-*-exc-Latn can't be what you really want, how about: > > lang = ( 2*8ALPHA *3( "-" extlang )) / "*" > extlang = 3ALPHA > > Either "*" for the complete <lang>, or no "*" in this part. > Or do you want lng-exa-*-exc-Latn for matching ? Bye, Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru > > _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.