Notwithstanding my co-editor's points, I do track and update the matching draft as appropriate and will update the matching draft with the various fixes as necessary. However, I do agree that a Last Call on Matching is a bad idea at this time. So: send us fixes and they'll be incorporated, but never in preference to preparing the registry draft. Addison Addison P. Phillips Globalization Architect, Quest Software Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. > -----Original Message----- > From: ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Frank Ellermann > Sent: 2005?6?13? 17:48 > To: ltru at ietf.org > Subject: [Ltru] Re: draft-ietf-ltru-matching-02 > > Mark Davis wrote: > > > The matching document has had not nearly the same review, > > nor has the same timetable in the charter. > > Randy mentioned it when we talked about the Paris timetable. > > It needs some clean-up before it can survive Bruce's famous > reviews. For the ABNF I just found a third potential issue: > > lang = ( 2*8ALPHA *[ "-" extlang ] ) / "*" > extlang = 3ALPHA / "*" > > lng-exa-*-exc-Latn can't be what you really want, how about: > > lang = ( 2*8ALPHA *3( "-" extlang )) / "*" > extlang = 3ALPHA > > Either "*" for the complete <lang>, or no "*" in this part. > Or do you want lng-exa-*-exc-Latn for matching ? Bye, Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.