John.Cowan wrote:
>> lng-exa-*-exc-Latn can't be what you really want
[...]
> No, it isn't:
> we want * or lng-* or lng-exa-* or lng-exa-exb-*.
Okay, then let's try to fix it:
lang = ( 2*8ALPHA *3( "-" extlang ) ) / "*" /
( 2*8ALPHA *2( "-" extlang ) "-*" )
extlang = 3ALPHA
=> "Bill's ABNF Parser No errors during parsing."
------------------------------------------------------------
Mark, I've no fresh ideas for the registry draft, my issues
with 831...833 are already posted here, please read and / or
answer these posts. I don't find issues in the proper order
of priority, and of course I know that the registry draft is
more important. So far only Peter and Randy commented, they
apparently agree that "something" is still odd in draft -04.
Doug apparently agreed that "frozen" Preferred-Values aren't
optimal, and he found various minor nits around this issue.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.