Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote: > I agree with the suggestion that a new M.49 numeric ID should not be > registered immediately, but that some time be given to permit the ISO > 3166-MA to add a corresponding entry, if they're going to take such > action within a reasonable time. I'm not sure what that reasonable > time should be; one year seems like a long time, but I don't know how > much time they typically require. I have no problem with the theory here, but I think if we wanted to adopt such an approach, we would have to spell out the time frame rather precisely. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.