Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote: >> If 003 is listed as "macro-geographical number" on their >> page we need no ticket, it's then simply correct. The >> last time I looked at their page that wasn't the case. >> >> IIRC you (?) intended to ask them what this footnote is >> supposed to mean, Web page typo or historic. Bye, Frank > > Are we rat-holing again on the details of the draft registry rather > than staying focused on the ID? I see Randy assigning a ticket number to issues involving the initial registry, and confirming that the draft registry needs to be ready soon along with the registry draft. So I thought this was a legitimate, focused, and timely thread. Before continuing it, though, I'd like confirmation from a co-chair. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.