Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy dot claranet dot de> wrote: >> Don't forget the matching draft, and the initial registry. > > If you want the latter to be "last called" and approved before > Paris, with all missing Suppress-Scripts discussed and fixed, > then you have a serious problem. All I can do is to post the > current Suppress-Scripts based on Doug's lstreg.txt 2005-06-05 It is a known fact that the set of language subtags without a Suppress-Script is not complete, and probably never will be. (Not to mention the languages like Chinese for which Suppress-Script is explicitly not desired.) The supporters of Suppress-Script, who carried the day, did not regard this as a problem. This is done and over with. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.