Doug Ewell wrote:
>> it outputs the comments shown below, no problems
[...]
> Is this a complaint that the "Added" date of the deprecated
> subtags comes after their "Deprecated" date?
From my POV "no problems". My script just lists these cases
as "manual checking might be necessary, a _deprecated_ subtag
was apparently _added_ after the preferred subtag".
Mark and Addison discussed dates in an old "canonical forever"
thread. I just wanted to be sure that it's really no problem,
and not only my POV.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.