Mark Davis <mark dot davis at jtcsv dot com> wrote: > I like that approach. > > >We register NO M.49 subtags that are not macro-geographic regions > => We initially register NO M.49 subtags that are not macro-geographic > regions I'm good with that too. For those who don't have the draft registry committed to memory, that means we don't register 200 (which we already agreed on), and we also don't register 830 or 833 (which are currently there) or 831 or 832 (which aren't). -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.